What does this accomplish?
#1
Posted 05 March 2012 - 09:35 AM
Granted, she hasn't been tardy that many times before. But still.
#2
Posted 05 March 2012 - 09:49 AM
So. I just heard on the news that a local elementary school is instituting a new policy: If a child is tardy 4 or more times in one six week grading period, the child will only get pb&j sandwiches (and I think they said they won't allow outside food for the kid), no matter how much money they have on their lunch account. This just seems WRONG to me. Too many variables. What if the kid is allergic? If they are tardy, they probably aren't eating breakfast either, so just one small sandwich seems like you'd be setting them up for failure by not giving enough food to sate their hunger. And I'll be damned if you don't allow my kid to use her lunch money for freaking lunch OR let her eat a sack lunch I gave her.
Granted, she hasn't been tardy that many times before. But still.
Well, if it did say they won't allow kids to bring in their own lunches, that's odd. But you're not sure, so? And I can't imagine a school forcing an allergic child to eat a sandwich?
In our elementary schools they have the same policy and it's gone fine. If you come in too late, after hot lunch choices are tallied, you get a bag lunch (a sandwich and piece of fruit) instead of hot lunch. Too many kids were late, causing hot lunches (or more specifically, the amts and types of what's to be prepared) to be off. There wasn't enough hot lunches, esp for the all kids who hadn't been late, that wanted them. This corrected that issue.
I've no idea if that's why this district is implementing that policy, but it's why ours did, and like I said, it solved the issue of hot lunch shortages. They also implemented others to address the tardiness issues, but this one was mainly to fix the problems caused by so many kids being late.
Edited by twizzle, 05 March 2012 - 09:54 AM.
#3
Posted 05 March 2012 - 09:56 AM
We've been tardy a few times, not a lot, maybe 3 or 4 over this entire year. 1 of those times was for a dental appointment. We live the farthest from that school than any other family. That's a fact. In fact, the house to our left goes to another school district. I know being further away is no excuse, and that it was our choice to take her to this farther away elementary school, but when it played out in day to day life in the beginning of the year it sometimes got messy. The school says 9-3:15, but even if we got there at 8:50 everyone is already in their classes quietly working because the buses get them there at 8:35-8:40. We were getting her on time, but it looked like we were late, and it interrupted, I think, the flow of things for the class when dd walked in. We finally just gave up and started taking her there at 8:40 to get there at the same time as her classmates. We should have done that from day one but whatever.
This primarily affects parents who drive their kids to school. You know, the ones paying for their kids' transportation costs, and not relying on the school's budget to do it.
Edited by butterflywings, 05 March 2012 - 09:56 AM.
#4
Posted 05 March 2012 - 10:39 AM
ETA: if this school is like DD's, they start at 7:45. Otherwise, they start at 8:00 an. So, more likely than not, someone starting at 7:46 (or 8:01) they are considered tardy and that is being generous i think at DD's school, the first bell rings at 7:36 and the tardy bell rings a bit before 7:45. Last six weeks DD had 3 due to that stupidness (I think 7:45 is way too early to start school).
ETA2: I did specifically hear that this rule is to address the TARDy issue and nothing else. I just don't see how it will address that issue.
Edited by angeleyeskkhr, 05 March 2012 - 10:44 AM.
#5
Posted 05 March 2012 - 10:53 AM
This the school?
http://www.kristv.co...-as-punishment/
#6
Posted 05 March 2012 - 11:23 AM
#7
Posted 05 March 2012 - 11:29 AM
I also think that I wouldn't even say anything to them, if they tried this with my kid. I would just contact an attorney and make it ugly from the get go.
#8
Posted 05 March 2012 - 11:36 AM
They don't tally lunches here. It is offered/available to all.
ETA: if this school is like DD's, they start at 7:45. Otherwise, they start at 8:00 an. So, more likely than not, someone starting at 7:46 (or 8:01) they are considered tardy and that is being generous i think at DD's school, the first bell rings at 7:36 and the tardy bell rings a bit before 7:45. Last six weeks DD had 3 due to that stupidness (I think 7:45 is way too early to start school).
ETA2: I did specifically hear that this rule is to address the TARDy issue and nothing else. I just don't see how it will address that issue.
My sister and I started school at 7:20 every morning.
#9
Posted 05 March 2012 - 12:10 PM
#10
Posted 05 March 2012 - 02:00 PM
If the kids know to look up the menu for that day....they will know which days to be tardy.
Just say'n
The school may find they have a lot of tardy kids on brussels sprout day.
#11
Posted 05 March 2012 - 02:34 PM
Edited by angeleyeskkhr, 05 March 2012 - 02:36 PM.
#12
Posted 05 March 2012 - 02:38 PM
EDIT: I guess the older kids would be more responsible about getting to school on time, but K-4th or so...mot so much.
Edited by Bad Doctor Frost, 05 March 2012 - 02:39 PM.
#13
Posted 05 March 2012 - 04:00 PM
What does it accomplish? Control. It's one more way for the failed public school system to control a losing battle. It just seems silly, and you're right...what will it accomplish in the long run? I mean, how many children of that age are actually responsible for getting themselves to school? I'm going to assume not many. So, why not punish the kid because the parent, bus driver, etc... couldn't get them there on time, right? It makes perfect sense.
EDIT: I guess the older kids would be more responsible about getting to school on time, but K-4th or so...mot so much.
Oh dear lord in heaven...
I agree with what Frosty said (and yes I did feel a little dirty inside when I typed it.)
#14
Posted 05 March 2012 - 05:51 PM
#15
Posted 05 March 2012 - 06:52 PM
What does it accomplish? Control. It's one more way for the failed public school system to control a losing battle. It just seems silly, and you're right...what will it accomplish in the long run? I mean, how many children of that age are actually responsible for getting themselves to school? I'm going to assume not many. So, why not punish the kid because the parent, bus driver, etc... couldn't get them there on time, right? It makes perfect sense.
EDIT: I guess the older kids would be more responsible about getting to school on time, but K-4th or so...mot so much.
Oh dear lord in heaven...
I agree with what Frosty said (and yes I did feel a little dirty inside when I typed it.)
![]()
I believe it was AutoBodyChick who told me on FB once that I was just saying what everyone else was scared to. I tend to do that. It's OK, you can join me in the Club of All Things Right, we have cookies
#16
Posted 06 March 2012 - 03:10 PM
What does it accomplish? Control. It's one more way for the failed public school system to control a losing battle. It just seems silly, and you're right...what will it accomplish in the long run? I mean, how many children of that age are actually responsible for getting themselves to school? I'm going to assume not many. So, why not punish the kid because the parent, bus driver, etc... couldn't get them there on time, right? It makes perfect sense.
EDIT: I guess the older kids would be more responsible about getting to school on time, but K-4th or so...mot so much.
Students in our district aren't counted tardy if the bus is late.
#17
Posted 06 March 2012 - 03:24 PM
In our elementary schools they have the same policy and it's gone fine. If you come in too late, after hot lunch choices are tallied, you get a bag lunch (a sandwich and piece of fruit) instead of hot lunch. Too many kids were late, causing hot lunches (or more specifically, the amts and types of what's to be prepared) to be off. There wasn't enough hot lunches, esp for the all kids who hadn't been late, that wanted them. This corrected that issue.
I've no idea if that's why this district is implementing that policy, but it's why ours did, and like I said, it solved the issue of hot lunch shortages. They also implemented others to address the tardiness issues, but this one was mainly to fix the problems caused by so many kids being late.
it's been a very long time and i may misremember, but i dont remember a 'tally' taken of what i wanted to eat at lunch...or am i just forgetful and it's that way in all elementary schools and been so forever?
regarding the OP it seems like they handle the wording of this wrong. it sounds more like punishment than logistical issues how it's written
#18
Posted 06 March 2012 - 06:30 PM
#19
Posted 06 March 2012 - 09:04 PM
dd told me today (she is 9th) and she has been struggling in school the last year (some of it is are fault we where not keeping an eye on things as we should have, just been in a depression) but anyway, she is failing Art, I know it is Art but she is concreting on her core classes and making sure those have passing grades, she needs those to go on to high school, Art can be made up.
The Art teacher told the vice principal (interesting how the principal never is involved) anyway saying dd had a bad attitude and she was failing etc, dd told vp what she told Art teacher and even showed him (I saw it very pretty art project she did) but the Art teacher said it wasn't done right she gave her an F....anyway the vp said due to her attitude and failing Art she will have to have pbj and either it will be an apple or carrots and milk for the rest of the school year AND I still have to pay the same amount I pay for a hot lunch meal for her to have it
As for the tardiness part I think it would be more beneficial say if the kids had to stay after school some sort of dentition...I know it is up to us parents to get them up or if they are going to impose this they should allow lunches to be brought from home.
ETA: just find out that for this lunch they put her in a dentition room for the rest of the year for lunch, so the whole lunch hour by herself in a room, not going to happen, her doctor while write a not saying that will not help her depression.
Edited by mdw2006, 06 March 2012 - 09:11 PM.
#20
Posted 06 March 2012 - 09:13 PM
That has got to be one of the craziest things I've ever heard!!!! How is feeding your dd a pb&j sandwich every day supposed to improve your dd's attitude? If I were her, that would just piss me off even more. Do you not have the option of having her take her lunch to school instead of purchasing from the school?anyway the vp said due to her attitude and failing Art she will have to have pbj and either it will be an apple or carrots and milk for the rest of the school year AND I still have to pay the same amount I pay for a hot lunch meal for her to have it
and she gets less food.
#21
Posted 06 March 2012 - 09:19 PM
That has got to be one of the craziest things I've ever heard!!!! How is feeding your dd a pb&j sandwich every day supposed to improve your dd's attitude? If I were her, that would just piss me off even more. Do you not have the option of having her take her lunch to school instead of purchasing from the school?
anyway the vp said due to her attitude and failing Art she will have to have pbj and either it will be an apple or carrots and milk for the rest of the school year AND I still have to pay the same amount I pay for a hot lunch meal for her to have itand she gets less food.
I am going to check, dd said mom I will eat the lunch (dh is like if she does they ARE NOT making us pay hot lunch prices)but what she is more concerned about is the isolation. That will make things much more worse, I have contacted her counselor to see what we need to do.
#22
Posted 07 March 2012 - 12:49 AM
Hell. No.
#23
Posted 07 March 2012 - 08:50 AM
I'm not getting the pb&j business for tardies. That wouldn't fly here. And having to sit in ISS for lunch because she's failing a class? Nope. Their consequences don't match the behavior.
It's not that hard. Tardy to school/class, you serve a detention. Tardy again, you serve another detention. This shouldn't be a difficult concept.
Failing the class is between the student, parents, teacher, and perhaps the college placement counselor. A bad attitude in class should start with the student, parents and teacher, too. And I'd want a definition of bad attitude. She's looking at the teacher funny? Tough noogies. The teacher can deal. She's mouthing off? That will be addressed by the parent. But to immediately "mention it" to the AP when I haven't called the parent yet? Shame on the teacher.
But this sitting in the ISS room for the rest of the year is ridiculous. It sounds like this school doesn't know how to handle teenagers at all, which is unbelievable since this is the business they are in.
I'm a little irritated by this again this morning.
#24
Posted 07 March 2012 - 09:44 AM
The school your kids are at has some of the wackiest discipline standards I have ever heard. And I taught for 15 years.
I'm not getting the pb&j business for tardies. That wouldn't fly here. And having to sit in ISS for lunch because she's failing a class? Nope. Their consequences don't match the behavior.
It's not that hard. Tardy to school/class, you serve a detention. Tardy again, you serve another detention. This shouldn't be a difficult concept.
Failing the class is between the student, parents, teacher, and perhaps the college placement counselor. A bad attitude in class should start with the student, parents and teacher, too. And I'd want a definition of bad attitude. She's looking at the teacher funny? Tough noogies. The teacher can deal. She's mouthing off? That will be addressed by the parent. But to immediately "mention it" to the AP when I haven't called the parent yet? Shame on the teacher.
But this sitting in the ISS room for the rest of the year is ridiculous. It sounds like this school doesn't know how to handle teenagers at all, which is unbelievable since this is the business they are in.
I'm a little irritated by this again this morning.
Not only that but the child has been dealing with the loss of her brother for what? A year? That's no amount of time at all.
EFF DD's school, Eff the art teacher and Eff the VP as well. Foot in azzes, M. Foot in Azzes
#25
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:04 AM
I am not saying that excuses dd if she was mouthing off etc and if she was you get in touch with me to come down and talk about it, if a dentition is necessary that is fine...one dentition not the rest of the year.
I will be stepping it up.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








