ffterry
Members-
Posts
332 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
hegemony reacted to a post in a topic:
the other Steven Katz...
-
hegemony reacted to a post in a topic:
the other Steven Katz...
-
Disputed Positive Trade Line To Decrease Account Age
ffterry replied to inquiryfiend's topic in Credit Forum
go *Admin removes vulgarity* yourself -
Disputed Positive Trade Line To Decrease Account Age
ffterry replied to inquiryfiend's topic in Credit Forum
Now you are just making crap up. That is pathetic. -
Disputed Positive Trade Line To Decrease Account Age
ffterry replied to inquiryfiend's topic in Credit Forum
That's funny because I am sure everybody who I called BS on in this thread has already searched to prove me wrong and they didn't find squat. Here's something funny: do not come to this site and call us and it's member liars. Did you search? I'll say it again, you aren't telling the whole truth. Maybe out of ignorance, I don't know. If you choose to call that lying then so be it. I searched, as does everybody else whenever this subject comes up and all you'll find is a very old anomaly or two. This was about disputing postive tradelines originally. Did you search that? So, thousands of members are lying but you know better? lol you're a troll. Haha, so you couldn't find anything either? lol I didn't look. Having read numerous threads about adverse actions due to disputing, I don't have to search. Haha And you would read a lot more threads about nothing ever happening when you dispute positive accounts and inquiries if you didn't try to squelch the subject. I understand your reasoning for doing so, to protect people, but honesty is better in the long run. -
That is ridiculously wrong. a shadow troll. I am honored instead of just stalking me why not explain what is wrong with my post? No CRA tacks on additional dispute time for logging in online to see the status of your dispute. Calling, maybe, but not logging in online. And the 4th CRA you refer to is irrevelant and even if it wasn't it doesn't add on dispute time no matter what you do. I am conservative with my disputes and would not risk any contact with one of the four major CRAs during an open dispute. Instead of commenting on the substance of that you clearly posted only to insult me. I hope you feel better; perhaps seek counseling. You weren't too conservative when you were trying to dispute your bankruptcy off. actually I was since I did not have success other than EQ. TU and EX the public record remained for almost 10 years. moreover, most of my IIB tradelines were on the full 7 years. but then you just make chocolate up. That's what happens when you send in your discharge papers to the CRA.
-
Disputed Positive Trade Line To Decrease Account Age
ffterry replied to inquiryfiend's topic in Credit Forum
That's funny because I am sure everybody who I called BS on in this thread has already searched to prove me wrong and they didn't find squat. Here's something funny: do not come to this site and call us and it's member liars. Did you search? I'll say it again, you aren't telling the whole truth. Maybe out of ignorance, I don't know. If you choose to call that lying then so be it. I searched, as does everybody else whenever this subject comes up and all you'll find is a very old anomaly or two. This was about disputing postive tradelines originally. Did you search that? So, thousands of members are lying but you know better? lol you're a troll. Haha, so you couldn't find anything either? lol -
Do you have any data to support this? Of course he doesn't.
-
That is ridiculously wrong. a shadow troll. I am honored instead of just stalking me why not explain what is wrong with my post? No CRA tacks on additional dispute time for logging in online to see the status of your dispute. Calling, maybe, but not logging in online. And the 4th CRA you refer to is irrevelant and even if it wasn't it doesn't add on dispute time no matter what you do. I am conservative with my disputes and would not risk any contact with one of the four major CRAs during an open dispute. Instead of commenting on the substance of that you clearly posted only to insult me. I hope you feel better; perhaps seek counseling. You weren't too conservative when you were trying to dispute your bankruptcy off.
-
That is ridiculously wrong. a shadow troll. I am honored instead of just stalking me why not explain what is wrong with my post? No CRA tacks on additional dispute time for logging in online to see the status of your dispute. Calling, maybe, but not logging in online. And the 4th CRA you refer to is irrevelant and even if it wasn't it doesn't add on dispute time no matter what you do. I am conservative with my disputes and would not risk any contact with one of the four major CRAs during an open dispute. Instead of commenting on the substance of that you clearly posted only to insult me. I hope you feel better; perhaps seek counseling. You were wrong. I called you on it and you call me a troll and insinuate I need counseling. That is pathetic.
-
That is ridiculously wrong. a shadow troll. I am honored instead of just stalking me why not explain what is wrong with my post? No CRA tacks on additional dispute time for logging in online to see the status of your dispute. Calling, maybe, but not logging in online. And the 4th CRA you refer to is irrevelant and even if it wasn't it doesn't add on dispute time no matter what you do.
-
Disputed Positive Trade Line To Decrease Account Age
ffterry replied to inquiryfiend's topic in Credit Forum
That's funny because I am sure everybody who I called BS on in this thread has already searched to prove me wrong and they didn't find squat. Here's something funny: do not come to this site and call us and it's member liars. Did you search? I'll say it again, you aren't telling the whole truth. Maybe out of ignorance, I don't know. If you choose to call that lying then so be it. I searched, as does everybody else whenever this subject comes up and all you'll find is a very old anomaly or two. This was about disputing postive tradelines originally. Did you search that? -
That is ridiculously wrong.
-
Disputed Positive Trade Line To Decrease Account Age
ffterry replied to inquiryfiend's topic in Credit Forum
That's funny because I am sure everybody who I called BS on in this thread has already searched to prove me wrong and they didn't find squat. -
Disputed Positive Trade Line To Decrease Account Age
ffterry replied to inquiryfiend's topic in Credit Forum
How long would it take for a fraud alert to kick in? In other words when will I know if I am out of the woods? You were never in the woods. I am sure that the numerous people on this and other boards who disputed accounts and wound up with a fraud alert take great comfort in your claim...I guess they just made up their stories just to be contrary to someone who might show up on the boards some months down the road and say it could not happen... Often is the claim, rarely do I see the proof. Just like disputing inquiries......... I understand you may be trying to protect people from themselves but it's usually better to just tell the truth. Instead of babbling crap, you can do a search right here on this site and see what can happen when you dispute inquiries. Proof is here to be found. And I resent your comment about telling the truth. I think if we didn't, we probably wouldn't be here today. We get experts like you all the time saying it can't happen, but it reality, it does. Predictable. You forgot to call me a douche nozzle like you do everyone else who corrects BS on this board. -
Disputed Positive Trade Line To Decrease Account Age
ffterry replied to inquiryfiend's topic in Credit Forum
There must have been one of those mysterious triggers. lol -
lol, yeah it works great for that.