Jump to content

The last post in this topic was posted 8056 days ago. 

 

We strongly encourage you to start a new post instead of replying to this one.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Alter Ego Liability: Doctrine that attaches liability to corporate shareholders in cases of commingling of assets and failure to observe corporate formalities.

 

Please note, however, that although a corporation's failure to hold shareholder or director meetings may subject the corporation to alter ego liability, this is not the case for LLCs in California. An LLC's failure to hold meetings of members or managers is not usually considered grounds for imposing the alter ego doctrine where the LLC's Articles of Organization or Operating Agreement do not expressly require such meetings

 

Alter Ego Theory (Source: http://www.toolkit.cch.com/text/P12_8310.asp)

 

Under the alter ego theory, the creditor seeking to pierce the veil of limited liability must prove that the owner did not operate his limited liability company (LLC) or corporation as if it were a separate legal entity.

 

It is this "separateness" that forms the basis for limited liability. Ordinarily, the LLC and corporation are recognized as separate legal entities, and each is responsible for its own debts. The owner, as a separate person, has no personal liability for the business entity's debts.

 

Accordingly, as long as the owner respects this separateness, the business entity will continue to be recognized as a separate entity, and the business entity itself (and not the owner, who is a separate person) will be responsible for the business's debts. The most the owner can lose will be what has been invested into the business entity. In other words, the owner will have limited liability for the business's debts.

 

Conversely, if this separateness is not apparent in the way the business owner operates the LLC or corporation, there is no basis for limited liability. In short, if the owner acts as if the LLC or corporation is not a separate legal entity, but instead just another side of the owner (i.e., his alter ego), the court may rule that the owner and the entity are one and the same. Thus, the owner will, out of necessity, have unlimited, personal liability for all of the business's debts.

 

In general, avoiding the alter ego theory means operating the business entities in ways that steer clear of the factual patterns wherein courts have applied the theory. As suggested throughout this discussion on asset protection, the owner should form an LLC or statutory close corporation, and then must separate and document ownership of assets.

 

Further, the formalities regarding division of authority within the entity, required meetings and recordkeeping must be observed.

 

Finally, the owner must separate his or her financial affairs from the entity's financial affairs, as well as separating the financial affairs among all operating entities.

 

Additionally:

Catch 22 Credit Crunch http://www.allbusiness.com/lessons/LL_Article01.asp


The last post in this topic was posted 8056 days ago. 

 

We strongly encourage you to start a new post instead of replying to this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      190435
    • Most Online
      9039

    Newest Member
    mhudson323
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines