Jump to content

The last post in this topic was posted 6557 days ago. 

 

We strongly encourage you to start a new post instead of replying to this one.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Occurs to me I'm always preaching asset allocation and diversification here. So I'll show what I do in my own 401k and open myself to insults and questions.

 

I have a pretty limited range of choices -- 15 funds from various fund families. They are all C shares, meaning they are not no-load funds, but instead carry a load in the form of a 1.0% annual 12b-1 fee, forever (as opposed to a typical 0.25% fee or less). This is not great for the investor, because it means each fund has an expense ratio usually above 2% a year. Kind of a bum deal, but I don't have a choice.

 

So with my choices I want an allocation that gets me participating in several diverse asset classes. Various of my15 funds pretty much fall into these asset classes:

 

Large Cap U.S. Stocks

Small Cap US Stocks

US REITs (commercial real estate companies)

Bonds (Gov't & Corporate)

Foreign ("International") Stocks

Money market

 

So I want to do 2 things: a) first decide on allocation percentages -- what my pie chart looks like, and b] Which fund is best to represent each slice of the pie. I expect to work another 20 - 25 years, so I want good exposure to risky assets.

 

So here's what I've settled on.

 

30% Large Cap U.S. Stocks -- Davis New York Venture C

20% Small Cap US Stocks -- Oppenheimer Main Street Small Cap C

20% US REITs -- Aim Real Estate C

10% Bonds -- Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond C

20% Foreign Stocks -- Alliance Bernstein International Value C

 

 

My allocation percentages are a naive approach, with those nice fat round numbers. You could use fancy software to analyze investment choices, past performance, and your risk tolerance to find a point on the "efficient frontier" -- which seeks an optimal balance of expected return with risk ... and wind up with allocations like 16.6% and 23.4%.

 

But an efficient frontier analysis is backward-looking and cannot predict the future anyway -- its Achilles heel. My approach is probably just as good and a lot simpler.

 

And about every 6 months, as the pie chart gets distorted from the varying rates of return among the funds, I REALLOCATE back to my planned allocation. This means shift money from the winners into the losers -- that's the discipline.

 

As for performance -- I don't really care about the short term ... I've got a 20+ year horizon. But, my 401k plan lets me click a button online and see that my portfolio's rate of return is at an annualized 1% year to date, and better yet an annualized 7% for the last quarter (that's actual return, not the result of new contributions). Compared with the US stock market S&P 500 being down nearly -15% year to date, I'm pretty happy, and that makes me pretty resistant to the gloom and doom I keep hearing.

 

Bets performers since my last reallocation are the Small Cap fund and the Real Estate fund. I could not have predicted that, but I'm glad I included them in my allocation.


The last post in this topic was posted 6557 days ago. 

 

We strongly encourage you to start a new post instead of replying to this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      190435
    • Most Online
      9039

    Newest Member
    mhudson323
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines