laynlow Posted January 19, 2025 Posted January 19, 2025 Hi We received a collection letter from a debt collector. The amount is about $325. Dear Spouse had been ordering some prescription medical equipment from this company. There were two instances where they shipped the equipment but botched the insurance protocols, so the insurance denied them. They charged our account at the time of shipment (an HSA debit card, probably the first mistake). I have statements from the insurance my liability for these is zero. After unsuccessfully resolving this with the provider, on the last shipment I simply withheld the amount in question. Phone discussions on this topic lasted about a year, and simply went in circles. I followed up with a letter including copies of the insurance and bank statements. The next month's bill credited one but not the other without explanation, then they sent the balance to the debt collector. So, I intend to dispute the debt and include copies of the insurance statement and bank statement. Is that overkill, given it is a medical debt under $500? The Why Chat method seems to not apply at this point yet. Thanks. Quote
Why Chat Posted January 20, 2025 Posted January 20, 2025 If the amount is under$500 it is not allowed to appear on your credit reports. I suggest you save time and effort and postage and ignore the CA. However, if you want to be sure nothing ever shows up make sure you are opted out and send a priority letter (no signature required) to the CA. https://whychat.me/ltrcavalhipaa.html Quote
embertmorton200 Posted September 17, 2025 Posted September 17, 2025 When I got a similar letter, I requested full debt validation under the FDCPA before responding. Always keep communication in writing and never admit liability. For tracking responses and timelines, I use tools like Phonexa in my business—it’s meant for leads, but the principle applies: documentation and visibility are everything when disputes get technical. Quote
Why Chat Posted September 18, 2025 Posted September 18, 2025 What may have worked in the past ie letters threatening FDCPA reporting is useless now as consumer protection agencies have been emasculated. Ignoring these bottom feeders is the best choice in these days of kidnapping every bit of data transmitted. MarvBear 1 Quote
SeekerOfWisdom Posted October 5, 2025 Posted October 5, 2025 On 9/18/2025 at 11:53 AM, Why Chat said: threatening FDCPA reporting is useless now as consumer protection agencies have been emasculated The CFPB has always been a paper tiger for individuals. Enforcing the FDCPA through an individual suit can be very effective if there's really a violation. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.