Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lovely Navient is posting 4, yes 4 charge-offs on my credit report.  I'm starting with Equifax.

 

Round 1:  Disputed because there was still a past due balance showing on the charged off accounts (all of them).  One Navient Account deleted, the rest were "verified."  Equifax "updated" the "date of last payment" to literally June 2020 ... on charged off accounts.   They still show a past due balance, even though the debts were sold to a collection agency. 

Round 2:  Sent a method of verification letter to Equifax.  Equifax responded with a "We don't have a credit file for you" letter.  Stall tactic?

Round 3:  Sent a second method of verification request with copies of the "we don't have a credit file for you" letter, proof of identity, copies of their previously "verified" accounts/"investigation results" pointing out they reported payments on charged off accounts.  Interestingly, the "little boxes" that appear under the accounts which tell you if it's a timely payment, late, or a charge off still show a "late/charge off" for the months Equifax says they verified I made payments.  Result:  Investigation is PENDING.

 

I signed up for MyFico and apparently, Navient is reporting these charge offs/lates, FRESH, on a monthly basis - even after they sold the debt.  Is this legal?  How can I be late on a debt that doesn't exist anymore since they sold it off? I had a charge off before for a credit card a long time ago and once it was charged off and sold (Navient sold the debt as well) it wasn't reported every.dang.month.  Is this legal or some sort of reporting violation?

 

Am I doing this correctly?  Should I do a 609 and demand that they show me a copy of my MPN?  TIA!!!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@maddox80I'll own up that my familiarity with student loan collections (a safe presumption since we're talking Navient delinquencies) is weak these days.  Still, I'll offer up the following for consideration:

 

Each loan extension while a student constitutes a unique debt, even if through a common issuer.  Thus it's standard practice (in fact, required) that while multiple loans through a single issuer might be set up under a master account, with a single monthly payment, the status of each individual loan is reported separately to the CRA's.

 

Concerning the sale of the debts to a collection agency:  Are you confident that these accounts have actually been sold, rather than just farmed out for collection by the agency (with proceeds being returned to Navient, after the CA takes a cut)?  What added reporting have you seen from the CA on your credit report?

 

As far as "charge off" reporting, if Navient continues to own the debts, then the continued monthly "charge off" notation is a convention that is used by some creditors so long as there's a balance outstanding after the charge-off event.  (I question the appropriateness of this type of reporting, but it's been reported anecdotally by others sufficiently often that I no longer assert that it's improper.)

 

I'll close with one key observation:  While I understand your concern with the impact of the adverse reporting, I strongly suggest that your attentions should be mostly focused on getting this debt out of default.  There's no way to avoid a continued deleterious impact on your credit prospects so long as that default isn't resolved.

 

Depending upon the nature of the student loan debt (whether it's government guaranteed or a private loan debt, e.g.) you may have some particularly attractive options by which to cure the default.  These may include options to refinance the debt and/or "rehabilitate" the debt.  You need to do some research and you may wish to open a discussion thread in the Student Loans forum here on CB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Dodd-Frank reform law gave the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau the authority to pass administrative regulations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. They did so with the enactment of Regulation V. Regulation V, Appendix E, I(b)(4) says that furnishers of information to CRAs should "update the information...as necessary to reflect the current status of the consumers account."  This includes the "transfer of an account... by sale or assignment for collection to a third party." Id. at I(b)(4)(i).  Is the trade-line from Navient accurate? Maybe; however, it is definitely not complete and does the not represent the "current status" or legal character of the debt in violation of Regulation V of the FCRA since the debt has been sold/assigned to someone else. The trade line should reflect a $0 balance to Navient and may make reference to the charge-off, closed, transferred/sold. The assignee may start a new trade line on your report, however. 

 

https://www.consumerfinance.gov/policy-compliance/rulemaking/regulations/1022/E/#b-1-i

 

I would send a dispute with Navient and the CRAs outlining this argument (but I also wouldn't admit the charge-off to the CRA if avoidable in case you want to try to remove it early later). I would also file a complaint with the CFPB.


Also check to see what the requirements are for rehabilitating a student loan? This can result in cleaning up trade lines if you're eligible, but I'm not sure at what point this ability ceases. 

Edited by CreditCurious20
Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you get that leads to believe the paper was sold?  Many student loans are never actually sold off but continue to be held by the entity that underwrote the loan(s).

 

Boxes suggest you are not looking at paper reports from the four major bureaus. 

 

A charge-off retains its charge-off status even if some manner of payment is made except and unless there was a basis upon which the account was reinstated to an active status (a rare event but can happen).  Further, a lender can continue to report their experiences with you into perpetuity.  They just won't be viewable beyond seven years and six months from the event that gave rise to the charge-off.

 

Generally, the best way to clear delinquency from student loans is to rehabilitate them...hopefully you have not burned that bridge.  You then lose the derogatory notations after something like six or nine months of payment.  Refinance to a lower rate at that juncture...

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/7/2020 at 1:02 AM, CreditCurious20 said:

The Dodd-Frank reform law gave the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau the authority to pass administrative regulations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. They did so with the enactment of Regulation V. Regulation V, Appendix E, I(b)(4) says that furnishers of information to CRAs should "update the information...as necessary to reflect the current status of the consumers account."  This includes the "transfer of an account... by sale or assignment for collection to a third party." Id. at I(b)(4)(i).  Is the trade-line from Navient accurate? Maybe; however, it is definitely not complete and does the not represent the "current status" or legal character of the debt in violation of Regulation V of the FCRA since the debt has been sold/assigned to someone else. The trade line should reflect a $0 balance to Navient and may make reference to the charge-off, closed, transferred/sold. The assignee may start a new trade line on your report, however. 

 

https://www.consumerfinance.gov/policy-compliance/rulemaking/regulations/1022/E/#b-1-i

 

I would send a dispute with Navient and the CRAs outlining this argument (but I also wouldn't admit the charge-off to the CRA if avoidable in case you want to try to remove it early later). I would also file a complaint with the CFPB.


Also check to see what the requirements are for rehabilitating a student loan? This can result in cleaning up trade lines if you're eligible, but I'm not sure at what point this ability ceases. 

I was also going to advise a complaint to CFPB, glad someone beat me to it :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By digitalscotch
      Hi, 
       
      I was attending school and then got a new job. I fell behind in one of my classes, and the professor withdrew me from the class.  I had student loans out for that term, and it appears that the school gave the tuition money back to the lender. They sent me a tuition bill. 
       
      I filed BK and it was discharged in September 2021. I included the school tuition in the BK. The school did not appeal the inclusion. Once the discharge was complete, the school sent me a bill for the tuition stating it was considered a student loan and not dischargeable. In the meantime, I consolidated and refinanced my student loans. 
       
      If the school wanted to dispute their inclusion in the BK, shouldn't they have done that prior to discharge?  They have sent my tuition bill to collections and I want to get it resolved as soon as possible. I wanted to get advice here first, but am considering having a lawyer send them a letter. 
       
      O Mighty CreditBoards, What say you? 
       
       
    • By leverup
      Hi there,
       
      This is a complicated story with a few parts, so I'll try to be as complete as possible.
       
      I'm a college senior currently trying to clean up the mistakes I made over my very short credit history thus far. I currently have 1 medical collection at $1500, 1 tuition collection at $4700, and have painstakingly carved my CCU from 90% to 50% (and going down every month). I also have plenty of federal student loans that are deferred until 2023, and have never missed a payment on accounts in good standing. TransUnion and Equifax hover around 660 these days, with FICO 8 and Experian closer to the 630s. 
       
      Regarding the medical collection: The bill was initially for a college physical and routine vaccinations back in summer 2019, and was supposed to be paid for by insurance. I had just turned 18 at the time, so I was oblivious to the way it worked, but my parents told me the clinic screwed the billing up and our insurance denied it. I didn't think I had to care since they told me they would take care of it, but they didn't. About a year ago, I ended up with a collection which I attempted to dispute it electronically (didn't know what I was doing), but it was validated. Roughly a month ago, it suddenly dropped off of my report, but today I got a voicemail from a new CA, so it's likely coming back within the next few months.
       
      Regarding the tuition collection: For my first two years of college, I attended a tiny regional private school that charged way too much for tuition, but my parents insisted that between the veterans' dependents' benefits, federal loans, and scholarships, I would be able to attend without any out of pocket cost. Like before, they let me down and it ended up costing far more than they told me. I was a stupid college kid who just got his taste of living away from home, and my spending and priorities were insanely out of whack, so my account balance kept climbing. At the end of sophomore year, I transferred to a more respected school with more financial aid, but I still had the balance on my old account with no way to pay it. Around July 2021, it was passed on to collections with the remark "affected by natural disaster" (referring to COVID). 
       
      After a reality check of sorts, I've been religiously budgeting, paying off my CCs, and exploring every clever credit building account under the sun. I haven't sunken completely yet, but I'm very fearful that 2 collections at age 20 is a recipe for disaster. I'm looking for the best way to handle these derogatory accounts, and don’t know what my options are. 
       
      I feel tremendously ashamed of the position I'm in, as I come from a family that's terrible at managing money, and because I'm 6 months away from graduating with a degree in finance. Somehow I ended up going down the road that I knew I should always avoid. I'm very anxious about my future and where to go from here, and I just need to know how to get out. 
    • By sfenescey
      Monifi/Mid first bank closed my account,while I realize they reserve that right, they told me in 3 different written communications that I would have access to my accounts until the 17th of November when in fact they revoked that access o. The 10th of November. Customer service has been less than helpful and has given me conflicting information. What are my options for an expedited solution? There’s 10140$ in there that they transferred right before they froze it and they continued to pull money from another account after the blocked my access. Thank you 
    • By felton1
      Hello,
       
      I'm in bit of an issue where a medical bill was fully paid, but the account is in collections. In an imperfect sequence of events, the insurance company briefly withdrew a previous payment and re-payed the provider. Meanwhile, the provider sent me the bill, went bankrupt and they are not reachable. Looks like they sold the debt to the CA and CA wants the money that was fully paid. I have the Explanation of Benefits and proof of the original payment. 
       
      Feb 2019 to April 2019 - Service Provided by an in-network medical service provider for my child
      May 2019 - Co-pay fully paid. Insurance fully paid. Account settled. 
      Sep 2020 - Insurance withdrew the payment (mistake). Provider sends me the bill for around $1,200. I disputed it. 
      Feb 2021 - Provider sends the account to the collection agency $1,200. CA sends me the letter. 
      Mar 2021 - Provider closes the door. Unable to reach the provider. 
      Apr 2021 - I sent the DV letter (after 30 days - on 39th day as I was traveling), used WhyChat DV letter. I got a vague response that I owe the money. 
      Apr 2021 - Insurance re-payed the provider in full. They sent me the Explanation of Benefits which shows the account is fully settled.
      Apr 2021 - Certified mail to the provider returns back (with HIPAA language), as the provider closes the door. Phone calls or emails not returned. 
      Sep 2021 - CA keeps sending emails. Contacted the Insurance company. The Insurance company contacted the CA by phone and told them the account was settled. CA informs the insurance agent that it will contact the service provider and sort it out. 
      Sep 2021 - CA reports to CRA. Credit scores drop. 
      Sep 2021 - Online dispute raised with CRA with full proof of payment. However, all disputes closed that the debt is valid. 
      Oct 2021 - CA sends me the letter I still owe $1,200 + interest. 

      I have the payment proof (insurance payment + co-pay that was paid in 2019). Can I please get your advise? Would this constitute as an insurance fraud? Should I send the proof of payment to the CA? Thank you so much. Appreciate it. 
    • By CandiedCredit
      I sent out a validation letter to a medical collection on the 1st. today the 17th i got an alert that a new account was added. The account was never removed to my knowledge but it is the same Collection but now the balance says zero.  Why would they do this? I haven't received any response from them.   Should I wait the 30 days to see if they remove, or move forward with another letter?  Thanks for any response 



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      183,025
    • Most Online
      2,046

    Newest Member
    LewisThomas
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines