Jump to content

Warning: Rules governing oversight of military lending may be changing


hegemony
 Share

The last post in this topic was posted 2121 days ago. 

 

We strongly encourage you to start a new post instead of replying to this one.

Recommended Posts


I don't see anything that is proposed that is worthy of outrage.  If someone is stupid enough to pay for something like gap without having done their due diligence, then that is on them.  Nobody twists their arm and forced it upon them. 

 

At what point is an individual going to actually be held responsible and accountable for their own fiscal missteps?  It seems that some, like Howard, want to keep a perpetual nanny state approach.  That benefits NOBODY, least of all the very victim class that people like him claim to want to 'protect.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/15/2018 at 3:34 AM, centex said:

I don't see anything that is proposed that is worthy of outrage.  If someone is stupid enough to pay for something like gap without having done their due diligence, then that is on them.  Nobody twists their arm and forced it upon them. 

 

At what point is an individual going to actually be held responsible and accountable for their own fiscal missteps?  It seems that some, like Howard, want to keep a perpetual nanny state approach.  That benefits NOBODY, least of all the very victim class that people like him claim to want to 'protect.'

 

That has to be THE most moronic comment I have ever read on CB.

 

The issue, Einstein, isn't individual accountability, due diligence, intelligence, protected class or even the nanny state concept.  The MLA benefits YOU.

 

Let's ignore for a fact that you have young naive teenagers who aren't prepared to enter the world of high finance.  Let's ignore that the realities of military service place one in civilian situations that the average citizen is never placed in.  The issue is whether we want a "stupid" member of our armed forces focused on his job during a time of conflict or whether we want him to be too worried about his family's finances that his focus is impaired while trying to protect YOU -- not that an asshat like you is even worth of protecting.

 

To dumb it down for you: We go out of the way to make this "stupid" soldier from having to focus on extraneous crap and instead focus on killing the person trying to kill you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last post in this topic was posted 2121 days ago. 

 

We strongly encourage you to start a new post instead of replying to this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share




  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      188478
    • Most Online
      2046

    Newest Member
    Hdavis23
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines