Jump to content

Please consider disabling your adblocker for CreditBoards if you have not already done so.  This site depends on advertising revenue to stay online.


Sign in to follow this  

How to proceed after furnishing proof of payment but creditor says validated late?

The last post in this topic was posted 2172 days ago. 

 

We strongly encourage you to start a new post instead of replying to this one.

Recommended Posts

I'm helping a friend with their credit report that includes an auto loan from Bank of America that shows a 30 day late from 2011 as well as a 30 day and 60 day from 2012. He has proof that he was not 30 days late in 2011 in the form of a cancelled check that he sent early for the month in question. He submitted a copy of the check in disputes about the 30 day late from 2011 to TransUnion and Equifax so far. After hearing back from TransUnion, he sent a 623 letter to BofA stating:

 

This letter hereby gives you notice that the above account, as it is being reported by Bank of

America on my credit reports, is disputed for lack of completeness and/or accuracy.

 

On August 25, 2014 I disputed this account on TransUnion where it incorrectly reports a 30-day

late on this account for Month 2011. In my dispute I provided proof that this was in error in the

form of my cancelled check #XXXX that clearly states that check was my Month 2011 payment in

the amount of $XXX.XX that I sent early (not late) in Prior Month 2011.

 

I was shocked to receive a response from TransUnion dated September 23, 2014 indicating that the

result of my reinvestigation. This Trans Union response did not correct the error, the 30-day late

from Month 2011, that remains in my TransUnion report as verified.

 

I now demand under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Section 623 that you perform an

investigation since you are the data furnisher of this information. In this letter, I once again provide

proof that I was not late with that payment by way of my cancelled check.

 

If you are unable to perform a reasonable investigation or are unable to locate the necessary

documents to investigate my dispute then you are required by the FCRA to remove the negative

information from my credit reports, which can also include complete removal of the account

altogether.

 

If you are able to conduct a proper investigation of the records for this account and identify the

information being incorrectly reported, please update the information being reported on my credit

reports to reflect accurate information found during your investigation.

 

Additionally, I am also requesting that you send me a detailed explanation of the methods used and

a description of the records reviewed when you conduct your investigation; including, but not

limited to, sending a copy of that information to me so that I can conduct my own investigation into

the accuracy of your records and verify that a reasonable investigation was completed.

 

Please be advised that I am also commencing a Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CPFB)

complaint given that I supplied proof of the error, yet the error remains.

Their response was underwhelming and dated the same day their received my letter:

 

Your inquiry regarding the credit bureau reporting for the above

referenced account was received.

 

What you need to know

After reviewing the account information, we've validated that all information being

reported on the account is accurate. As a result, the reported information will not be

changed.

I also submitted a CPFB complaint:

 

I disputed an inaccurate item on my credit report from Bank of America account number XXXXX that incorrectly states a 30 day late payment in Month 2011. I provided a cancelled check, #XXXX which clearly shows it was for this very payment. Handwritten in two locations on this check are specific instructions that it was for the Month 2011 auto loan payment, for early payment in fact. Instead of removing the error, TransUnion merely deleted some history for the account but failed to remove the incorrect 30 day late payment of Month] 2011 which was the point of the dispute and which has been proven to be false with the evidence provided.

To which I received the response:

 

We have reviewed your complaint along with the information you previously provided regarding this issue. On 09-03-2014, Bank of America #XXXX was notified of your dispute. In response to the investigation, the disputed information was verified or updated accordingly and the results were forwarded to you for review. We were unable to accept the documents you provided with your complaint. The document you provided was unacceptable to update Bank of America # XXXX because the document did not explain what information should be updated. However, your letter and all documentation provided by you were sent to the creditor for review. In response to the investigation, Bank of America # XXXX verified the account information as accurately reported.

To which I responded:

 

I see in the response the following: "We were unable to accept the documents you provided with your complaint. The document you provided was unacceptable to update Bank of America # XXXX because the document did not explain what information should be updated."

The attachment "TransUnion Dispute 2014-08-25.pdf (1.11 MB)" includes on approximately page 2 a copy cancelled check proving that the payment was not late for Month 2011. Please submit this proof that they are in error, and that the false late payment attributed to me should be removed from all credit reports.

I'm planning to send a second letter to BofA that basically says how could you conduct an investigation in a single day and what possible grounds do you have to say you are reporting correctly when I supplied proof that I made my Month 2011 payment? Additionally I will include Equifax in the letter this time since I've heard back from Equifax now.

 

Any suggestions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who did you file the CFPB complaint on, BOA?

 

If its a reporting issue you may also need to send separate CFPBs about the CRAs.

I filled one complaint against both BofA and CRA (TransUnion). Will now file additional complaints specifically about the CRAs (TU and EQ so far). Doing first dispute with Innovis and Experian now too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that this is any excuse for them, but always remember in 623s to not only list whats wrong but also tell them how it should be reported. Spell it out for them like you would a child.

 

"The 30 day late that is being reported for this account on Month 2011 is incorrect. I have attached a copy of the check that was used to pay for Month 2011's payment so you can review it as a part of your investigation. The check was dated Month 00, 2011 and was accepted by BOA on Month 00, 2011 as payment for this account, which had a scheduled due date of Month 00, 2011. After your investigation and review of the documents I provided, please correct the reporting on all of my consumer files to show that Month 2011 was an on time payment."

Edited by funkiehouse

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OP, just a thought,

 

I have had issues in the past with early auto payments. As it seems, some creditors will apply payments made outside of their normal billing cycle toward the principle balance only and not count the payment toward the next payment due. I have had to call on many of occasions to have the creditor apply my mid cycle payments toward the monthly payment that was due or the monthly payment would be considered late.

 

I understand that there was indications made on the check that the payment was for the following monthly payment. However, as was in my case, the creditor explained that the payment receiving process was automated and the computer only reads the payment portion of the check.

 

I know this doesn't help your situation, but it might be why BofA thinks the payment was late even though they received the check.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OP, just a thought,

 

I have had issues in the past with early auto payments. As it seems, some creditors will apply payments made outside of their normal billing cycle toward the principle balance only and not count the payment toward the next payment due. I have had to call on many of occasions to have the creditor apply my mid cycle payments toward the monthly payment that was due or the monthly payment would be considered late.

 

I understand that there was indications made on the check that the payment was for the following monthly payment. However, as was in my case, the creditor explained that the payment receiving process was automated and the computer only reads the payment portion of the check.

 

I know this doesn't help your situation, but it might be why BofA thinks the payment was late even though they received the check.

 

I agree that this can happen but it's an internal issue and shouldn't go against you if you clearly write what its for on the check. Someone has to open the envelope and see what's in it. This shouldn't be allowed as an excuse for incorrect reporting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

OP, just a thought,

 

I have had issues in the past with early auto payments. As it seems, some creditors will apply payments made outside of their normal billing cycle toward the principle balance only and not count the payment toward the next payment due. I have had to call on many of occasions to have the creditor apply my mid cycle payments toward the monthly payment that was due or the monthly payment would be considered late.

 

I understand that there was indications made on the check that the payment was for the following monthly payment. However, as was in my case, the creditor explained that the payment receiving process was automated and the computer only reads the payment portion of the check.

 

I know this doesn't help your situation, but it might be why BofA thinks the payment was late even though they received the check.

 

I agree that this can happen but it's an internal issue and shouldn't go against you if you clearly write what its for on the check. Someone has to open the envelope and see what's in it. This shouldn't be allowed as an excuse for incorrect reporting.

 

:good:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Request a payment history printout from BOA. If it shows the check being applied as extra principal the month before, explain that that is not what was supposed to happen and they shouldn't count it as being late the next month.

 

But I'm not sure it's worth fighting one old 30 day when there are worse lates (more recent and more days, and accurate) still on the account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But I'm not sure it's worth fighting one old 30 day when there are worse lates (more recent and more days, and accurate) still on the account.

Fighting the old one in the hopes we might get deletion of whole account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The last post in this topic was posted 2172 days ago. 

 

We strongly encourage you to start a new post instead of replying to this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Menta33
      I'm trying to help a friend with an Auto Loan that was at Bank of America that is now paid off. BofA is reporting 30 days late Aug 2011, 30 days late Dec 2012, and 60 days late Jan 2013.

      I am looking at the Metro 2 — 2012 Credit Reporting Resource Guide to understand how and when 30-day and 60-day lates are to be properly reported. In there I read:


      They then give an example of a payment due on January 15th and how it should report on the first of each month:
      January 1st: 0-29 days late (code 11) - no payments past due February 1st: 0-29 days late (code 11) - one payment past due March 1st: 30-59 days late (code 71) - two payments past due April 1st: 60-89 days late (code 78) - three payments past due This BofA loan appears to have a due date of the 1st of each month and a 5% late payment charged on the 12th of each month (unless that is a holiday or weekend, then next business day).

      The Metro 2 guide states later:

       
      Later I see this section on Date of First Delinquency:


      None of the CRAs show a Date of First Delinquency for this account, the field only appears on Equifax and is blank there, no mention of DOFD on any other CR for this tradeline.

      After analyzing the report supplied of the complete payment history on the account, this is what I find:
      The due date appears to have been the 1st of each month. A late charge of 5% is charged on the 12th of each month if payment not received by close of business on that business day. I don't know what day of month Chase reports to the credit bureaus, but I am assuming it is the first of each month, but perhaps it is last day of the month? How can I find this out? Account was 30 days late on August 31, 2011 Account was 30 days late on October 1, 2011 Account was 30 days late on December 31, 2012 Account was 60 days late on January 30, 2012 Only if BofA reports on the very last day of each month would their reporting be accurate if the due date is actually the 1st of each month.
       
      How can I know for certain what day of the month BofA reports to the credit bureaus? How can I find out for certain what day of the month payments were due and what their late payment charge policy is? Should I ask BofA to produce a signed contract for the loan? So far they've only provided a computer printout of the payment history.
    • By bunyan
      Hello,
       
      I already had one $5000 Cash Rewards Visa with BofA and a $300 limit Signature Visa as well. The $300 Visa was open since 2007. The $5000 limit one has been open since 2011. I also have a $2500 Amazon store card since about 2011 and a Capital One Quicksilver Visa with an $800 limit, and a Capital One Platinum MasterCard with a $700 limit. Have had both of those since 2010. The $5000 BofA Cash Rewards card, Amazon Store Card, and both Capital One cards have all been as the limit since last summer. I never had any late payments. I have had my checking account with BofA since 2007. I also have a business account with BofA. No Money Market amounts or anything like that with them. My Experian score is 726 (That's who they pulled)
       
      I was in the branch on Monday and the teller said I had a Credit Card offer. So I sat down with the representative, and had him put in an application for another Cash Rewards Visa with a $5000 limit. That was instantly approved and I got the credit card in the mail yesterday. So today I'm at work and decide to call in and do a balance transfer from my other cards to my new card. While I'm talking to the CSR I ask if he thinks I can get a CLI to 10 or 15 grand. He said he thinks I can and maybe they won't even do another inquiry since I just got this card yesterday. I said ok go for it. 15 grand. He doesn't get an immediate answer back and says I should hear something in the next 3 days. This was around 1PM today. I check my account at 4 and I see my limit is up to $15000 on my new card. Wooo hooo! The CSR also said that I can get a cash advance for up to my maximum credit line at 0% until April of 2016. Fees are 3%. He already had approved me for $4800 (Since my initial credit limit on the new card was only $5000) but said once I get my CLI just call him back and he can give me more.
       
      I'll be calling him Friday! Lol I'm gonna put all my other card balances on here so I can get the 0%. They'll be paid off well before then.
    • By Konrad2012
      I’ve been getting ready to do some CLI’s and such, and have been compiling information on BofA - jotting down my own personal dealings (not feelings), combing through threads, sending PM’s, making phone calls to BofA CSR’s and having others try things in their phone dealings as well (thanks Uber).
       
      I started to put together a repository of sorts and figured what the hell, I’ll just post it for everyone- present and future. Hopefully this can be a wiki-type post and people can add to or correct any of the below info.
       
      This is an objective post, not subjective. I didn’t put this together as a “reason I <3 BofA” post, nor for someone to list a bad CSR experience. I also understand that in 2008-2010 BofA balance chased individuals. I cannot find any widespread evidence of that recently (within 4 years) happening. So please try to keep this as a what you can/can’t do post and leave feelings out of it.
       
      Perhaps some info on how BofA treats BK's (how long since discharge is required for secured, how long since discharge is required for unsecured), how BofA treats people who burned them (do they blacklist) etc could be added.
       
       
       
      Applications
      BofA, Fidelity and Merrill all use the same underwriting and analyst departments.
       
      According to the credit pulls database, BofA products pull from various CRA’s, even in the same state.
       
      You can have multiple BofA products with little problem. If you already have any BofA/Fidelity/Merrill product and would like to apply for another product, you might want to do the application by phone. BofA is
      notorious for taking credit line from one product in order to give you another product.
       
      You cannot apply for two products with the same hard pull.
       
       
      CLI’s
      While Bob’s “Master Issuers who give Auto CLI’s” does list BofA and I have found several other examples, on the whole they do not appear to be common. A CLI will more than likely require a request. Some people get hard inquiries, some people get soft inquiries. So expect a hard.
       
      Requested CLI’s have been granted in as little as 60 days since opening a trade line.
       
      Requested CLI’s have been granted in as little as 60 days since the last CLI.
       
      If you have more than one BofA/Fidelity/Merrill product and would like to request a CLI, you might want to do the request by phone. BofA is notorious for taking credit line from one product in order to increase your credit line on another product.
       
      You cannot request CLI’s for two or more products on the same hard pull.
       
      You cannot combine a new application for one product and a CLI for another existing product on the same hard pull. Doesn’t matter which one you try first. Maybe you get lucky and the CRA combines the pulls, but that is luck and not the doing of BofA.
       
      With supporting income, BofA cards can have extremely high individual limits. I have seen reports of $100K.
    • By MJPEREZ77
      I know there are a lot of you who have either 1 or more of these cards. I believe that basically, from what I can read, they all tie in to BofA. So to my understanding, they are all underwritten by BofA, correct? Also, I realize that they all have their different benefits, but can anyone chime in on which may be a "better" choice to apply for? I don't see where there is a banking/investment account requirement for the Merill+, is that correct?
       
      Thanks CBers!
    • By MJPEREZ77
      Hi, wondering if anyone has a Current B of A Recon phone #. I have tried the ones here and have had NO LUCK! DW just got denied for a Better Balance Rewards Card after a $9k CLI on Plat Plus. Hoping to take advantage of the this, since it was a Pre Qual Offer.
       
      Thanks



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      179,618
    • Most Online
      2,046

    Newest Member
    dp4266
    Joined

About Us

Since 2003, creditboards.com has helped thousands of people repair their credit, force abusive collection agents to follow the law, ensure proper reporting by credit reporting agencies, and provided financial education to help avoid the pitfalls that can lead to negative tradelines.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines