Jump to content

Zombie Debt - Is it legal for CA to report it to CRA's


SRQ
 Share

The last post in this topic was posted 3924 days ago. 

 

We strongly encourage you to start a new post instead of replying to this one.

Recommended Posts

I have been trying to get a correct, legal answer to this question. I have several zombie TL's on my reports which come back verified (thanks Experian and Equifax). Various online sites say reporting zombie debt (debt known to be outside of the statute of limitations) is illegal, while other sites that debt can remain on credit reports for 7 years.

 

Is there a straightforward answer to this?

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have been trying to get a correct, legal answer to this question. I have several zombie TL's on my reports which come back verified (thanks Experian and Equifax). Various online sites say reporting zombie debt (debt known to be outside of the statute of limitations) is illegal, while other sites that debt can remain on credit reports for 7 years.

 

Is there a straightforward answer to this?

 

Thanks.

 

SOLs for suit defenses are set by the states and are usually under 7 years. Reporting SOLs apply to the reporting of negative credit items and are 7 years for most negatives. They are completely different.

 

 

This is the federal law that regulates and establishes reporting SOLs. A few states impose smaller reporting limits for certain kinds of debts.

http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fcradoc.pdf

Edited by cashnocredit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't confuse collections SOL with reporting SOL. They can legally report it up to 7.5 years from the DOFD. Usually it's easy to get it deleted earlier.

 

BTW, zombie debt is a term used to describe debts past both of these SOL.

Edited by mendelssohn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks funkiehouse. very straightforward.

 

but now i'm at a loss as to how to get these CA's off my report. One idea I have is to dispute to the CRA's that the amount is wrong as there is interest being charged. I live in Florida.

 

Do you know if it's against the law for CA to respond to a dispute and NOT state they will not sue due to debt being time barred? Also, must they delete if the CRA verifies but the CA doesn't indicate the TL is disputed by consumer?

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last post in this topic was posted 3924 days ago. 

 

We strongly encourage you to start a new post instead of replying to this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share




  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      189715
    • Most Online
      2046

    Newest Member
    Ellis50
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines