Jump to content

The Master obsolete delete time frame thread


Recommended Posts

I see this question posed quite often so I figured we could have a thread where people could post their obsolete deletes.

 

The info we would want to list should be; Which CRA, how many months till fall off, and how it was disputed.

 

 

I just had a few deleted from TU. I disputed them through US mail non certified. They were 5 months from deletion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

BK7 removed from TU yesterday! Scheduled to be removed 1/2021.   I called in and the rep asked some ID verification questions. She then said there was an error on my report and she was

Three more vanquished this morning on TU dispute site.  It seems automatic when checking the "too old" box when within 6 months. 

Well..  an update.  I had read from a rouge element poster on MF about a method that seems to be working with TU regarding EE  and tried it.  It involves the dreaded online dispute method.  I tried it

I'm watching this thread. :)

 

Can you include what you had deleted? I'm particularly interested in whether it was an OC or JDB. I read somewhere here that the CRAs told someone that there was a difference but I haven't been able to find the thread again.

 

I have a bunch of things that will fall off in 6 months so I'm trying to decide when to pull the trigger.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm watching this thread. :)

 

Can you include what you had deleted? I'm particularly interested in whether it was an OC or JDB. I read somewhere here that the CRAs told someone that there was a difference but I haven't been able to find the thread again.

 

I have a bunch of things that will fall off in 6 months so I'm trying to decide when to pull the trigger.

 

Thanks!

 

I started this thread because I have a bunch of TLs between all 3 that fall off between now and Sept of 14. Before sending the disputes out I wanted to see what luck people have had.

 

I agree maybe we should list OC, CA, Mortgage, etc.

 

When you dispute online with TU there is a difference between OCs and CAs. If you look at the dispute reasons that you can choose you will notice that they are different. There is no option of too old to report for CAs, but it is there for OCs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the post that I read (and have never been able to find again) a poster reported that in a call to a CRA (I don't remember which one) the rep told the poster that they had more leeway with one type of account than another. I just don't remember which.

 

It was something like: if an OC is more than 2 months out, we have to check with OC but if a CA is within 6 months, we can just delete...

 

It drives me crazy that I can't find the post now. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had 1 tradeline on TU deleted 5 mo early. Another 5 mo early was verified, disputed it again and was deleted 4 months early on 2nd try.

I dispute one at a time. I have one obsolute dispute on TU in now and they usually answer in about two weeks. all are OC's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep track of a lot of this stuff in Excel worksheets.

 

Here are my notes in that format for the two TLs I attacked using the (early) obsolete dispute. Santa's hat is only covering the name of each creditor. Both of them are household-name credit card issuers, though.

 

68146952-3a36-43b1-a50f-a3357600f3e6_zps

Did you do the online route or was everything postal mail?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did dispute a well known JDB in August. It was online, EQ only. It was actually a mistake on my part (over complicated spreadsheet I created) so it was 6 months before it was scheduled to fall off. (Thought it was only 3 months out due to my error.)

 

The dispute was unsuccessful. It came back verified.

 

But then in September, it inexplicably disappeared from all 3 reports.

 

5 months early for EQ,

3 months early for TU

1 month early for EX

 

Strange coincidence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back when I had some baddies there was a point where I had sufficient credit and was motivated more to understand what impacts credit than actually fixing my credit. I had CAs and a lien and my plan was to watch them go away one at a time and remove (via withdrawal) the lien at different times on each CRA to see what the relative impact of a lien, CA and lien, or just lien was. I disputed one of two CAs on EX about three months before they would automatically fall off and left the other CRAs alone. EX promptly deleted that CA and the other one as well. A few days later TU and EQ also deleted all the CAs. So there I was with a lien and no way to experiment any further.

 

On to the lien. All in all it came off fairly easily. TU deleted upon online request. EQ verified from an online request but deleted promptly after a phone call and faxed withdrawal. EX verified an online request then verified a written request. At that point I got annoyed and mailed a point by point cover letter with numbered, included documents and a specific request for their information supplier contact should they once again verify the lien. They took their sweet time and notified me they couldn't use the provided information to delete but were sending it to their info supplier (LN, I believe). It was deleted a few weeks later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello members,

 

I have 2 First Premier CC's that are scheduled to be obsolete by Nov '14 but wanted to test my luck and will mail out letters to the CRA's to delete them. In addition to the CC's, I have a repo only reporting on my TU and EX that should be removed by June of 14 that I am also requesting the CRA's to delete. Does any one of you have letters you sent to the CRA's for obsolete items?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I keep track of a lot of this stuff in Excel worksheets.

 

Here are my notes in that format for the two TLs I attacked using the (early) obsolete dispute. Santa's hat is only covering the name of each creditor. Both of them are household-name credit card issuers, though.

 

68146952-3a36-43b1-a50f-a3357600f3e6_zps

 

Did you do the online route or was everything postal mail?

Online.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just last week I sent all three CRA's a dispute letter for obsolete removals, but JUST realized it is NOT RECOMMENDED to send it RETURN RECEIPT. Has any one had obsoletes removed when sent CMRR?

I don't see how it could possibly matter as to the outcome of your dispute if you requested a return receipt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just last week I sent all three CRA's a dispute letter for obsolete removals, but JUST realized it is NOT RECOMMENDED to send it RETURN RECEIPT. Has any one had obsoletes removed when sent CMRR?

I don't see how it could possibly matter as to the outcome of your dispute if you requested a return receipt.

 

Well, picture trying to pet the kitty who's tail you just lit on fire. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Just last week I sent all three CRA's a dispute letter for obsolete removals, but JUST realized it is NOT RECOMMENDED to send it RETURN RECEIPT. Has any one had obsoletes removed when sent CMRR?

I don't see how it could possibly matter as to the outcome of your dispute if you requested a return receipt.

 

Well, picture trying to pet the kitty who's tail you just lit on fire. ;)

 

 

I don't think the kitty who is in charge of running the letter-opening machine will tell the kitty who's in charge of operating the scanner that the kitty who signed for your envelope is pissed.

 

MEOW.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I kept my obsolete disputes simple, remember you are asking them to delete early and they don't have to. No need to send these rgistered either.

 

Would you please delete the following account. According to my records this account is too old to be reporting (obsolete).

Link to post
Share on other sites

it has also been said that you shouldn't use fancy words like "obsolete" because they don't know what that means. I am going to post my letter.

 

Hopeful Consumer

777 Lucky Street

Lucky, LK 77777

 

File #: XXXXXXXX

SSN: XXX-XX-XXXX

DOB: XX/XX/19XX

 

Transunion Consumer Relations

PO Box 2000

Chester, PA 19022-2000

 

12/09/2013

 

Dear Credit Bureau,

 

Upon receiving my credit report the following accounts are listed on my report, however it is past the legal filing limit for a negative account. Please remove this account ASAP from my credit profile and send me an updated copy of my credit report.

 

STUPID CREDITOR #XXXXXX****

 

Sincerely,

Hopeful Consumer

Edited by futurehomeowner?
Link to post
Share on other sites

I kept my obsolete disputes simple, remember you are asking them to delete early and they don't have to. No need to send these rgistered either.

 

Would you please delete the following account. According to my records this account is too old to be reporting (obsolete).

Yes, that's the type of syntax I used in my online disputes, all of which were successful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I plan on disputing these online since I can't see the value of creating a paper trail in this case.

 

I want to dispute 1 on TU right now but I can't seem to figure out how to dispute online with them. I recently sent a snail mail dispute that just completed about a week ago. I can get online but it will only let me view my dispute results and a PDF of my current report. There are no links to dispute items.

 

Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?

 

In January, I'm going to start disputing EQ and hope they transfer to EX. I'm waiting for a snail mail dispute to complete so I don't want to add anything now. And I'm hoping that there's some psychological advantage to being in the same year. (I mean, right now, maybe they look at it and say to themselves... " this isn't obsolete till next year." But if I wait a couple of weeks, they look at it and say to themselves, "ya, this is just a few months out....")

Link to post
Share on other sites

I plan on disputing these online since I can't see the value of creating a paper trail in this case.

 

I want to dispute 1 on TU right now but I can't seem to figure out how to dispute online with them. I recently sent a snail mail dispute that just completed about a week ago. I can get online but it will only let me view my dispute results and a PDF of my current report. There are no links to dispute items.

 

Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?

 

In January, I'm going to start disputing EQ and hope they transfer to EX. I'm waiting for a snail mail dispute to complete so I don't want to add anything now. And I'm hoping that there's some psychological advantage to being in the same year. (I mean, right now, maybe they look at it and say to themselves... " this isn't obsolete till next year." But if I wait a couple of weeks, they look at it and say to themselves, "ya, this is just a few months out....")

I was thinking the same thing. I have a few for EX and EQ that are due to fall in April. Dec-April just seems so much further than Jan-Aprl

Link to post
Share on other sites

I plan on disputing these online since I can't see the value of creating a paper trail in this case.

 

I want to dispute 1 on TU right now but I can't seem to figure out how to dispute online with them. I recently sent a snail mail dispute that just completed about a week ago. I can get online but it will only let me view my dispute results and a PDF of my current report. There are no links to dispute items.

 

Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?

 

In January, I'm going to start disputing EQ and hope they transfer to EX. I'm waiting for a snail mail dispute to complete so I don't want to add anything now. And I'm hoping that there's some psychological advantage to being in the same year. (I mean, right now, maybe they look at it and say to themselves... " this isn't obsolete till next year." But if I wait a couple of weeks, they look at it and say to themselves, "ya, this is just a few months out....")

TU won't let you do a online dispute until it's been about 30 days from when they received you last dispute, even if it was mailed

Edited by RoadToHomeowner
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By iadorebunnies
      Any explanation would be great. I thought to list a series of events would be better than some long paragraph. I have pics and proof for all events below. 
       
      Mid May: Ordered Vehicle (checked credit score showing 730 at the time)

      June 7: Toyota Financial Services received payment for old lease

      June 12: TFS closed account
       
      June 30: TFS reported to the credit bureau account closed on June 12

      Friday July 9: Credit was pulled by dealer (first of knowing of outstanding balance on a said closed account)Was able to get bumped to a Tier 2. (Nothing was reported nor sent to me that I had an outstanding balance)
       
      Monday July 12: called Transunion because their score was what was pulled that hurt the deal. Transunion said that they show nothing of delinquency on my report AND show no history of it being removed nor it ever being on there in the first place.
       
      Evening July 12: called Experian because no other apps were showing a tier 3 credit score. They also said they had no history of it ever being on my report. (Talked to about five differnent people) They put me on a callback list to speak to a supervisor. Associate had said supervisor was in a meeting and would call back.
       
      July 13: Called Experian again to figure what happened. Received notifications that my credit score had increased 66 points and delinquency was removed notifications on Experian app. (No certainty that it was removed from report because they said there’s nothing bad on my report. I guess I take their word for it??)
       
      Evening July 13: received a notifications from credit apps that Toyota Motor Credit has reported positive activity on a outstanding loan balance. Loan paid.
       
      July 14: Called TFS to request document to cross reference dates.
       
      July 16: Called TFS to speak to Toyota Motor Credit. Turns out there’s no one to speak to in that department. It’s the same as calling TFS. Called Experian again to ask why they are just now reflecting on my credit that I had an outstanding balance that was just closed on July 13 not what TFS sent which states that it was closed in June 12. Experian had told me that the account was closed in June but when I explained to them that’s not what I’m seeing in my emails and notifications, they became combative and hung up on me. No one can tell me how and why on July 9, a inaccurate mistake cost me money and no one can send me my credit report to verify that there’s no delinquency. TFS agree that someone dropped the ball (but not them) and is willing to send any and all reports they have on my accounts. All credit bureaus has yet to send me to any documentation of removal of alleged delinquency and I will never know what happen on July 9th that cost me money. I’m paying more than I should and I could’ve been out of $1k(nonrefundable deposit to order vehicle) because I will not sign a tier 3 deal. Who knows how long I would’ve been without a car in this market if that were true.
    • By allclear
      Please excuse the lengthy post... hopefully you guys can give us some guidance regarding an issue with Citibank and our Citi AAdvantage Platinum Select World Elite Mastercard. Here is the situation:
       
      Citi AAdvantage Platinum Select World Elite Mastercard
       
      We had a Credit Limit of $9,000.00
       
      On 9/23/2020 we made an electronic payment of $5,000.00. Due to financial complications resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic the payment of $5,000.00 was returned. 
       
      At no point were we informed by Citibank that the aforementioned credit card was closed. However we also did not communicate with Citibank.
       
      We dug ourselves out of our financial issues and called Citibank on 3/24/2021 in response to an email we received about making a payment. At this point our balance was $15,359.93
       
      The issues begin with the 3/24/2021 call:
       
      On 3/24/2021 we spoke with a Citibank Representative and arranged to make a payment of $6,360.00 to be processed on 3/29/2021 on the condition that once it cleared the account would be:
      1. In good standing
      2. Open
      3. The card would be active (meaning we’d be able to use it)
      We verified the above 3 conditions multiple times with the Citibank representative and they confirmed. 
      As a side note, I remember specifically giving the Citibank Representative I spoke with on 3/24/2021 an example of what my definition of open and usable was so there was no confusion.
      We also agreed to setup automatic minimum payments.
       
      On 3/25 we received a message from Citibank confirming that we had enrolled in autopay - no where in this message does it state that the account is closed. In fact it reads as if the account is open and in good standing. 
       
      On 3/29/2021 the payment in the amount of $6,360.00 processed, cleared our account and posted to Citibank.
       
      And in fact based on what the Citibank representative confirmed on our 3/24/2021 call we made an additional payment on 3/29/2021 of $4,000.00. We received an email from Citibank confirming this and again at no point did it state the account was closed, and again it reads as if the account is open.
       
      On 3/30/2021 after we confirmed both payments ($6,360 + $4,000) cleared with no issues, we checked our account to make sure the card was active - as the Citibank representative told us it would be. At this point we became worried and began calling Citibank.
       
      We spent at least 4-5 hours and multiple phone calls on with different Citibank representatives, none of which could give us any direct answers. Finally, after poking around on the internet and in message boards we found a number for the Citibank Executive Response Unit. 
      We spoke with a very polite and helpful Citibank Representative in the Executive Response Unit who opened a case for us. 
       
      At this point I sent multiple emails following up and outlining what had transpired on the 3/24/2021 call. 
       
      We never once received an email response confirming receipt of emails. Every-time I would have to call and confirm receipt. 
       
      At some point we were assigned a representative with the Citibank Executive Response unit. 
       
      After multiple emails and phone calls, they called us back on 4/12/2021.
       
      On the 04/12/2021 the rep politely told me she listened to all our phone calls with Citibank especially the call in question that took place on 3/24/2021. The rep acknowledged/confirmed the following:
       
      That the Citibank Representative I spoke with on 3/24/21, stated multiple times when asked by me (multiple times) if by making the payment of $6,360 it would bring our account; in good standing/current, open, and usable - the representative answered "Yes". She also acknowledged that in addition to answering "Yes" the representative communicated to me in other ways that by making said payment the account would be in good standing, open, and usable.   
      We expressed to the rep that Citibank should honor what they committed to on our 3/24/21 call: An open account, in good standing, and with a useable card.
       
      While polite and understanding the rep said there was nothing she could do. After we pressed her and explained we felt Citibank’s behavior was deceptive (We did not use the word fraudulent, although we believe it was) Tanya offered us a $150.00 statement credit, to which we declined. 
       
      On 04/12/2021 following the call with the Citibank rep we sent a follow-up email, confirming what transpired on our call. We called the Executive Response Unit on 04/13/2021 to confirm the email was received and forwarded to said rep - this was confirmed. 
       
      On 4/13/2021 we filed a complaint with the CFPB - that read similar to all of the above post. In addition we stated the following would be an appropriate resolution:
       
      For Citibank to honor what they agreed to on our 3/24/2021 call.
      Open our Citi AAdvantage Platinum Select World Elite Mastercard so it is usable again. Bring our account in good standing with all 3 credit bureaus  Maintain our Credit-line of $9,000.000  In addition, considering what we’ve been through we’d like them to make a goodwill correction with all 3 credit bureaus. 
       
       
      On 4/27/2021 we received a response from Citibank via email. Which basically stated there is nothing they could do, the account would remain closed, there would be no Goodwill correction with the CRA's, and that they would in fact report the account to the CRA's as "disputed by consumer".
       
      Also on 4/27/2021 we received an email from the CFPB stating that the company has responded. Status on the CFPB website shows "Closed Company Responded"
       
      And here we are today...
      What do you guys think? 
      Should we push this more? 
      Is there a way to escalate further?
      Any and all advice/suggestions/comments much appreciated!!!
       
      Thanks in advance!
    • By Diana2021
      Any advice is much appreciated! 
       
      I graduated with my masters in Aug 2020 and havent had a full time job since Dec 2019. My mom was laid off because of covid in March 2020 and I stopped making payments to credit cards after graduating from my masters (Sept 2020) because my student loans stopped coming and my mom could barely make her own mortgage payments. Since Sept 2020, Ive severely damaged my credit and am now in over $27k cc debt. 
       
      I've since moved to Europe and don't plan to come back to the US, at least not for several years, to pursue lower cost education here. 
       
      I don't know how to proceed with my cc debt because I've been told since my credit is already tanked that it wouldnt matter if I pay off my debt, attempt to lower my 23-25% interest rates on my 9 credit cards, or try to negotiate a lower payoff. 
       
      I work part time remotely for a client in the US but the work is random and not guaranteed. The most I've made since I started with her in Dec 2020 was $1100 a month. 
       
      I contacted a debt consolidation law firm in the US but they want to charge me a $750 retainer and then $600 a month for 36 months to pay off my cards. Im waiting to hear if they guarantee these cards will be paid. 
       
      No idea how to proceed and feeling overwhelmed because I want to do the right thing but Im drowning in interest rates and have called two banks to talk with them only to be yelled at and shamed. 
       
      Do you have any advice for me?
    • By TheDeansClub
      Trying to help a friend and thought I'd pose the question to the board as I do research here on best course of action.  I'm having a little trouble deciding on the best advice to give here...
       
      Backstory:  Financial hardship going back years.  Besides making some poor choices, extenuating circumstances exist... 
       
      ~3.5 years ago, 2 things converged - debtor decided to take highest balance and highest APR CC, and get Cap1 to zero-out the APR via 60-90 day late (thought that was the only way to get the offer).  Right before that ball rolled, Cap1 sold the account to a theretofore unknown CC Co.  Debtor decided to stick with the plan and on day 80-whatever, got the financial hardship, closed account 0% APR with the new CC Co.  Balance was $7K.  Fast-forward 3 years, this company supposedly sent 2 letters saying the financial hardship plan was expiring.  Debtor received no communication from them in the mail.  Received no email.  Company is claiming they sent them.  Company is saying the payment plan the account is under is no longer available and they've reinstated the original APR but did not reopen the account (at least to the debtor's knowledge they have not).  Debtor will not be able to manage under the reinstated APR (26%), balance is now ~$5K.  Debtor was under the impression that the payment plan was there until the account was paid to 0, as they closed the card - does not recall receiving any written confirmation of the payment plan terms, and it will take some time to dig through files (if they did provide something in writing, it is saved somewhere in a file).  Calling the company was bush league - seemingly no financial hardship department, agents who didn't seem to understand what options were available for financial hardship, could not answer whether the account was currently open or still closed, request to speak with a supervisor has so far gone unheeded - no returned phone call.
       
      What I'm trying to determine firstly is - what rights does the debtor have here if any?  Is there any recourse for not receiving notification of this expiration?  Currently there is no option to transfer the balance.  I'm unsure whether to advise for a flat "withhold payment and settle."  But perhaps it has come to this.  By all accounts there are no professionals to speak with via phone for this CC Co.  Maybe this is just a strategy of "best of bad options to dump this creditor and move on." 
       
      Appreciate help in brainstorming... 
    • By Toast73
      So I disputed (or so I thought I disputed) addresses off the Big 4. TU removed all addresses except for my current. EQ has my current and another non-BK address. EX won't budge.
       
      All bureaus froze. Microbilt, LexisNexis, SageStream, Chex, you name it. 
       
      Try to get full verification of the bankruptcy on my file, thinking the whole Trial Rule 1005 thing would help me (this rule makes only the last 4 of your social, full name and addy public-facing).
       
      No dice.
       
      This was the response L/N fed me, including a few notes in RED.
       
      Please critique, tell me I have no chance for removal, something....
       
       




  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      182,470
    • Most Online
      2,046

    Newest Member
    Janae123
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines