Please help clarify between disputes with CA and OC

[User7890]

I have four CO's I want to dispute. They are: Comenity Bank/Maurices, GE Money Bank/Belk, KCA Financial Services (Windstream), and Verizon Wireless. I identify KCA Financial as being the only CA. (All of these are paid CO's and due to fall of late 2014, early 2015.)

 

The jackattack is only used for CA right? (Have disputed with CRA's and came back verified.)

Is jack attack and 1-2 punch the same thing?

What method should I begin using for dealing with OC? (OC TL's have been disputed and came back verified by all three CRA's) Should I begin asking CRA's how they verified or should I ask for verification from the OC?

 

Thanks!

User7890

[Erin42]

I have four CO's I want to dispute. They are: Comenity Bank/Maurices, GE Money Bank/Belk, KCA Financial Services (Windstream), and Verizon Wireless. I identify KCA Financial as being the only CA. (All of these are paid CO's and due to fall of late 2014, early 2015.)

 

The jackattack is only used for CA right? (Have disputed with CRA's and came back verified.)

Is jack attack and 1-2 punch the same thing?

What method should I begin using for dealing with OC? (OC TL's have been disputed and came back verified by all three CRA's) Should I begin asking CRA's how they verified or should I ask for verification from the OC?

 

Thanks!

User7890

 

Jack attack goes to the CRA. (http://creditboards.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=313560)

 

1-2 punch is a timing thing - send dispute to the CA, once received (you get the green card back) dispute with the CRA. You can use the jack attack letter during the 1-2 punch when it comes time to send your CRA dispute letters. (http://creditboards.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=428895)

 

I'll save your last question for someone who knows better than I do.

Edited September 23, 2013 by Erin42