Jump to content

The Master Credit Score Mad Scientist Thread


BobWang
 Share

Recommended Posts

I can't remember the big parts of the '04 and '08 versions of FICO, but is there a different reason other than the more inquiries that might be creating such a rift in my DCU FICO (EQ, '04) and my Walmart FICO (TU, '08) that could be based on the scoring models?

 

I don't have any negative accounts, all reports essentially show the same info, so consider all things equal except the inquires and scoring models.

 

 

BIG difference is that FICO 08 ignores AU accounts, and is more forgiving of TINY baddies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 429
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I can't remember the big parts of the '04 and '08 versions of FICO, but is there a different reason other than the more inquiries that might be creating such a rift in my DCU FICO (EQ, '04) and my Walmart FICO (TU, '08) that could be based on the scoring models?

 

I don't have any negative accounts, all reports essentially show the same info, so consider all things equal except the inquires and scoring models.

 

 

BIG difference is that FICO 08 ignores AU accounts, and is more forgiving of TINY baddies.

 

EQ seems to really hate me when old accounts fall off.

 

In 2002 or so, I got the bright idea to close all my credit cards that I didn't use very much. Life should be simple, right? <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2002 or so, I got the bright idea to close all my credit cards that I didn't use very much. Life should be simple, right? <_<

Yeah, that was simple

 

 

minded :P

 

I deserve it after my Amex crack the other day. :lol:

That WAS a good one. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't remember the big parts of the '04 and '08 versions of FICO, but is there a different reason other than the more inquiries that might be creating such a rift in my DCU FICO (EQ, '04) and my Walmart FICO (TU, '08) that could be based on the scoring models?

 

I don't have any negative accounts, all reports essentially show the same info, so consider all things equal except the inquires and scoring models.

 

 

BIG difference is that FICO 08 ignores AU accounts, and is more forgiving of TINY baddies.

 

Hmm. Neither of those are really issues with me. I'd hate to think it's all the inquiries that are giving a 46 point difference, but I guess that's what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't remember the big parts of the '04 and '08 versions of FICO, but is there a different reason other than the more inquiries that might be creating such a rift in my DCU FICO (EQ, '04) and my Walmart FICO (TU, '08) that could be based on the scoring models?

 

I don't have any negative accounts, all reports essentially show the same info, so consider all things equal except the inquires and scoring models.

 

 

BIG difference is that FICO 08 ignores AU accounts, and is more forgiving of TINY baddies.

 

I wonder why my '08 FICO is so much lower than both '04 and '98 FICOs (At least 45 pts difference)...maybe it's less tolerant of a PR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was from his Penfed checking? Push or pull?

PenFed Checking to PenFed Visa transfer.

 

I think that would be a push, since immediately deducted from Checking.

 

Takes 2 days to show up in Visa transactions.

 

The 1st $447 took 10 days, the 2nd payment of $251 took 11 days to be reflected in "Available Credit"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ES2's Credit Karma:

 

2011-11-02 CK TransRisk=719, Auto=825, Vantage=742 [C] 101% Utilization

2012-03-29 CK TransRisk=757, Auto=883, Vantage=840 24% Utilization

2012-04-16 CK TransRisk=757, Auto=883, Vantage=857 23% Utilization (11% overall, 14 accts, 1 inq, $1,637)

2012-04-21 CK TransRisk=745, Auto=857, Vantage=844 14% Utilization (10% overall, 14 accts, 1 inq, $1,321)

2012-04-25 CK TransRisk=740, Auto=843, Vantage=838 14% Utilization (10% overall, 14 accts, 2 inq, $1,321)

2012-05-02 CK TransRisk=740, Auto=843, Vantage=839 14% Utilization (10% overall, 14 accts, 2 inq, $1,321)

2012-05-04 CK TransRisk=740, Auto=843, Vantage=856 0.06% Utilization (0.01% overall, 14 accts, 2 inq, $2)

2012-05-05 CK TransRisk=740, Auto=843, Vantage=844 45% Utilization (3% overall, 15 accts, 2 inq, $448) (PenFed Visa)

2012-05-21 CK TransRisk=736, Auto=870, Vantage=855 45% Utilization (3% overall, 15 accts, 2 inq, $448) (PenFed Visa)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PenFed is really weird.

 

It's either PenFed or USAA that posts peoples' paychecks a day earlier.

 

Not sure about PenFed, but USAA definitely does it. My paycheck is always available on Thursday vs. Friday.

Edited by MiamiStudio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ES2 applied for Capital One over a month ago.

Haven't heard anything, but a $3k CapOne showed up today on his CK report.

 

2012-05-31 Capital One MC $3,000 CL reports

 

Credit Karma:

2011-11-02 CK TransRisk=719, Auto=825, Vantage=742 [C] 101% Utilization

2012-03-29 CK TransRisk=757, Auto=883, Vantage=840 24% Utilization

2012-04-16 CK TransRisk=757, Auto=883, Vantage=857 23% Utilization (11% overall, 14 accts, 1 inq, $1,637)

2012-04-21 CK TransRisk=745, Auto=857, Vantage=844 14% Utilization (10% overall, 14 accts, 1 inq, $1,321)

2012-04-25 CK TransRisk=740, Auto=843, Vantage=838 14% Utilization (10% overall, 14 accts, 2 inq, $1,321)

2012-05-02 CK TransRisk=740, Auto=843, Vantage=839 14% Utilization (10% overall, 14 accts, 2 inq, $1,321)

2012-05-04 CK TransRisk=740, Auto=843, Vantage=856 0.06% Utilization (0.01% overall, 14 accts, 2 inq, $2)

2012-05-05 CK TransRisk=740, Auto=843, Vantage=844 45% Utilization (3% overall, 15 accts, 2 inq, $448) (PenFed Visa)

2012-05-21 CK TransRisk=736, Auto=870, Vantage=855 45% Utilization (3% overall, 15 accts, 2 inq, $448) (PenFed Visa)

2012-05-31 CK TransRisk=737, Auto=850, Vantage=846 45% Utilization (3% overall, 16 accts, 2 inq, $448) (CapOne MC Reports)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ES1's 3 accounts from February hit 3 months of age for a 23 point pop on CK TransRisk

 

2012-04-21 TransRisk 694, Auto 865, VantageScore 751 [C] (Citi $36 to $23 of $4k)

2012-05-02 TransRisk 699, Auto 865, VantageScore 752 [C] (6 inquiries)

2012-05-31 TransRisk 699, Auto 865, VantageScore 749 [C] ($23 to $145 of $4,000) (0.6% to 4% utilization)

2012-06-01 TransRisk 722, Auto 865, VantageScore 750 [C] (3 Accts from Feb hit 3 months of age)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share





  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      189318
    • Most Online
      2046

    Newest Member
    cheesy
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines