Jump to content

Please consider disabling your adblocker for CreditBoards if you have not already done so.  This site depends on advertising revenue to stay online.


loderunner

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    93

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. loderunner
    Dude rest easy, I don't work there--so quit messaging me. So says the man who camped this thread for 4 hours last night. I know I know--just my irresistible charm. Also, why did you quote that post?
  2. loderunner
    I knew a girl who worked at Keurig call center (actually was a contractor--G something, I forget). She did nothing but Keurig customer service. Some of Keurig's models have a clear tank. In her years working there, she had three customers called up, extremely pissed due to some consequences of this design. You win $50 if you can guess why. No cheating. ...they assumed it was a separate tank that functioned as an aquarium. Killed their fish. Ok, now hands up if you are one of the three who called. I know you're here.
  3. loderunner
    Damn, that is like an instant classiness enhancer. Me Chinese Me make joke Me make pee pee In your Coke. EDIT: Sorry, is that too explicit for the thousands of toddlers that avidly read this site?
  4. loderunner
    Just can't stay away, sorry. Such a wonderful surrealist commentary on the American educational system. Please, let's keep this short bus of delusion rolling. What else do you honestly believe I said? Have you not yet deciphered the part where I claimed responsibility for 9/11 ? Or perhaps you could ask the non-methanol-drinking readership what their interpretation is. They may have noticed, perhaps, that I never said I was going to sue or that I threatened them with a lawsuit, but that I told them I was prepared to sue if they didn't investigate the matter like I had repeatedly asked. It's the difference, you see, between: - threatening to sue the instant a cashier hands you back a $5 instead of a $50 - first arguing with the cashier for twenty minutes and then in mentioning "Well, um, there's a video camera up there so you know I could probably sue you to get my money back, right?"
  5. loderunner
    Because I made a good 'offensive' (to whom, I really must wonder) joke? Or do you think Kasey is my sock puppet invented to confirm my story? (Though, I suppose he probably wouldn't) This is not that entertaining to me, I am just bored shitless waiting for issues to resolve and life to become bearable again and the router is dying whenever I try Netflix. If you preferred me whining in 10 page replies, I could go back to doing that. Or shut up. Whatever.
  6. loderunner
    Dunno. Sounds like an Flower Pot
  7. loderunner
    Fascinating. The renaissance of ideogram-based communication.
  8. loderunner
    My life really is like that. Although the main thing I posted on here previously about, the medical bill drama, does not seem so terribly strange to my recollection.
  9. loderunner
    Did I accidentally stumble into a conference on professionalism here? chocolate.
  10. loderunner
    Hi. Could you check your PMs please? I saw it after the fact. But I have to tell you--you would go bang your head in the wall if you knew where I worked.Ouch. I really don't--Hope OP learned a lesson to cover his rear end on the Internet. He brought up anal...so probably not You see? Setup, it's all about the setup.
  11. loderunner
    I have to ask, is this some kind of odd haiku variant or something?
  12. loderunner
    The blending is subtle. I never said the humor was (although, I did take the effort to add some wordplay there. It's not a one-dimensional joke. It was a setup, you see, for someone to say "No thanks!") I can let this die if there's some kind of weird custom around here that the replies must continue so long as the OP replies or something.
  13. loderunner
    I prefer a subtle, piquant blend of serious and not, but it seems to be an acquired taste.
  14. loderunner
    No. The cool kids wear 2πs.
  15. loderunner
    That's because I was successfully given help a while back and no one has the time, patience, or in some cases reading comprehension skills, to actually notice. The peanut gallery decided to throw a slumber party (I guess that's the culture around here? Well, I've seen much worse. Certainly better than seeing people constantly complain about locks and bans and flame wars) so I don't see why I shouldn't have any fun. It's an interesting game to see if it's possible to rephrase/repeat an idea enough so that it actually penetrates into (certain) other people's cerebrums, so that the conversation can move forward. I still think it's theoretically possible. I appreciate your post, I do. That must have taken you some time to write. However, virtually every single word of it has been covered already. In this thread. And there is no more advice I can think to ask for at this time--the cogs are in motion and at this point I'm just enjoying the ride and possibly in a few months I'll have a story to tell. Essentially, I enjoy the irony of the mockery here enough to think it's worth provoking (in that limited sense a troll, sure), although I suppose there is still the theoretical possibility that an actual conversation about one of these topics could re-develop.

About Us

Since 2003, creditboards.com has helped thousands of people repair their credit, force abusive collection agents to follow the law, ensure proper reporting by credit reporting agencies, and provided financial education to help avoid the pitfalls that can lead to negative tradelines.

Pages

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines

  I accept