quote Kevin20:
QUOTE
Are you under the illusion that you have actually said anything that is verifiable? You've done nothing but utter a bunch of rants and opinions. I was wondering if eventually you'd actually assert something that could be debated or fact-checked, but you haven't -- your thinking is too muddled.
Well, how about?
A considerable enough portion of the American population is not only lacking any savings, but also in sufficient enough debt to unfavorably impact the economy.
Inflation is grossly misrepresented by the fed.
Socialist policies enacted by Washington have passed the burden of those who do not plan properly back onto taxpayers who do.
QUOTE
In essence, the world economy is a house of cards that depends almost entirely on a corrupt and unsustainable form of usury.
Whatever -- that's just a metaphor, unless you really think the world economy consists of a bunch of small pieces of stiff laminated cardstock that are placed vertically and horizontally into patterns. You can't prove the metaphor is apt, and I can't exactly prove it's wrong. It's a meaningless statement
House of Cards meaning. The sentence speaks for itself. And I refer to
fractional reserve banking as being inherently corrupt and unsustainable. The very concept of lending money that you don't have while collecting usury on it is unethical and should be criminal.
The Creature From Jekyll Island comes to mind.
QUOTE
This can be taken to the national level as well. America has seen it's apex and is on the decline.
What does that mean? Actually the U.S. is far richer and more powerful than it was at any time in the past -- and will be more so in 10 years and 20 years and 30 years. Oh but maybe you mean something else -- perhaps you want America to maintain the same share of world GDP that it had in 1946 when the rest of the developed world was in ashes and China and India were living in stone-age poverty. Do we want to keep the rest of the world in poverty? Is that a good thing? Because when you introduce modern technology, finance, and management to them, they can grow very quickly from a low base. Economists would call that "catching up the frontier of technology and economic productivity".
The fed owes more money than America can pay back at any foreseeable point in the future. The fed only sends orders for what...maybe 30% of the currency in circulation? How can this possibly translate into being "far richer than at anytime in the past?" Let me guess, it isn't as simple as balance sheets right? It requires "sophistication."
And I could care less about the 3rd world. The west in general and the US in large part absorb their ever-increasing populations as it is. We use our resources and build the infrastructure to accomodate them. Why on earth do "we" feel the need to help them along with this at our own demise?
QUOTE
There is really no doubt about this and it cannot be changed so long as people are content with their foreign made crap and toys that allegedly make our lives so much better.
I have lots of foreign-made things that indisputably make my life better -- that's proved beyond any debate by the fact that I have spent my money buying these things, and I use these things to my great benefit. Your opinion about that has no value.
And there I agree, my opinion has no more value than yours which is that all of this crap that Americans en masse have traded for savings and security is somehow indisputably improving their lives. BTW, where does all of this junk end up after it's been updated and outmoded.
After all, ending is better than mending and there is no such thing as resource toxification or the Chinese chug.
QUOTE
but I also remember things before our culture was saturated with all of this junk (including the www), and things were indeed better in a lot of ways.
You are stating an opinion based on your own preferences. Your own preferences mean absolutely nothing either to me or to anyone else on Earth who is not you. I remember the 1970's, and I think the world is fantastically better today in literally every way I can even think of, other than that now I'm halfway to the coffin. But then again, that's just my own preference, isn't it? Funny how that works. That's why economists collect actual statistics.
That's true as well. My own preferences are not to compete in almost every industry with someone in India or Singapore who can complete the same task for less than one-quarter the wage while my cost of living and taxes continue to escalate. The www has it's many drawbacks. And yes, it's all perspective but then again, why have economists if not for puting the number to the observation. It doesn't take a economist to tell you that you are being squeezed by more players and in ways that certainly do not benefit your home or community.
Quote Sunnyone:
QUOTE
I have one other thought - if it is so bad to you, and you are bold enough to start your own company, start the change!
Fix it!!
Share what you do - we will listen and possibly imitate.
First, fix yourself, then we will copy....
First of all, it isn't "bad for me." I'm doing fine, but the pressure is always there so I can relate to some of the people who are griping. Being that as it is, I try to figure out where the pressure is coming from in order to find out what part of it that I have control over and what part I do not. And I have already started the "change."
I research before I buy and buy locally first and foremost.
I will tell others why I do not shop at certain outfits and won't buy certain brands.
I save and invest in tangible assets.
I try to have a sense of what's coming down the pipeline by researching and planning accordingly.
I am educating my kids on issues of finance and personal independance.
The list goes on.
BTW, aren't you the one who brought up using the spellchecker?