I was a student for half of 2007 (I graduated in May 07). I was a part time waitress the whole year while looking for a post-college job so I only made $13000 (that the gov't knows about...shhh) and my total tax was $393 (this is after a whopping $29 refund via dd). This was what I was expecting as my stimulus rebate before I learned that college students wouldn't be getting one.
My parents did not claim me as a dependent for last year, but I guess they could have because I was a student for part of the year. I am not a student at all in 2008. I have had a full-time job the whole year making about $30,000/year pre-tax plus a part-time cocktail waitressing job where i make about $12,000/year (but only about $6,000 that the government knows about... SHHH!

)
So, what I've gathered from this is that
1. I will not be getting a $393 stimulus DD because I COULD have been a claimed as a dependent in 2007, which is the year the stimulus packages are based on.
2. Because the stimulus package is actually an ADVANCE on 2008 Taxes, and because I was not a student in 2008 and had a higher reported income and therefore I paid more taxes, I should probably get the whole $600 rebate (Single filer, no kids) in 2009.
Is this correct? For the record, I am 22, but am completely financially independent and not a student at all in the 2008 tax year.