QUOTE(zachzchw @ Nov 23 2007, 08:58 PM)

The loan is still with the Department of Education. That is the only creditor shown with the loan, no CA or anything. If she rehabbed with them, would the negative status change to positive, after the 9 payments, since it is still the original lender's tradeline?
Im very confused by the student loan stuff....
Lynn, what would be your recommendation in regards to this situation?
Who was her original lender? Was it through Direct Loans (i.e., through DOE)? If so, then her guarantor and lender are both DOE. CAs don't generally report for SLs -- the loan is still held by the guarantor; the CA is just retained to collect. Has she been contacted by a CA or is it with DOE's Debt Collection Service (DCS -- or something like that)? If she's been contacted by a CA, she has to deal with them for rehab, but the reporting issues are still with DOE. Does she know who is actually holding the loans or is she only going off of her reports? If it's the latter or if you aren't sure, she can find out on the NSLDS. If she needs a PIN or doesn't know how to access it, there's a sticky at the top of this forum. It will tell her where her loans are. From what I've seen (and this is general practice and NOT guaranteed, so YMMV of course!), Direct Loans, assuming that's who your wife's loans are with, are the best ones to have. They tend to delete all of the negatives after rehab.
Basically, she has two choices and there are pros and cons for both. She can consolidate or PIF right away and start school in January with new loans. The negative there is that the none of the negatives will be removed. Otherwise, she can enter rehab and wait until summer or fall 2008 term to enroll. The credit issues are obviously better here, but she wouldn't be able to start school until later, assuming loans are necessary.
Hope this helps!! Good luck!!