QUOTE(blueberry @ May 5 2007, 03:46 PM)

Why Chat,
Your response must have crossed my post, because I didn't see it. I did read your instructions, "for deposit only by ______", but several years ago I did this for a cable bill within the first 2 months of being sent to a CA and the CA, not the cable company deposited the check. I do not know exactly what you wrote "several years ago" but a "for deposit only account of XXX XXXX" is presumably a binding prohibition under banking laws for it to be "signed over" to anyone else. Without seeing the cancelled check/money order, I would not be able to comment. In any case, it doesn't really make much of a difference in a NON MEDICAL account, as there is NO similar "leverage" available about notification restrictions by an OC to a CA for a cable company bill
So, you see I have a concern about this, which was why I was asking.
Anyway, my only deviation from your process was to write an initial letter without payment before the HIPPA letter with payment. I chose to do this for because of the possibility, however remote, that the OC would agree to accept payment and remove the account from collections voluntarily. It has been known to happen.
However, apparently you are implying that writing a letter prior to the first HIPPA letter but after dispute has destroyed the legal HIPPA basis.
I am curious to know why, simply for my own edification.
No, I didn't mean that your inquiry "destroyed" the HIPAA proccess, simply that it was not part of it, as you had not yet apparently established a current relationship between the reporting CA and the OC and your "inquiry" was an unneccessary "blip".
Now, if the OC had turned your letter over to the reporting CA, and the reporting CA had responded, that MIGHT have caused a problem, as you made an offer to pay that MIGHT have negated any further "HIPAA" steps.
The reason for the initial dispute to the CRA is to establish THAT current relationship, or to get a deletion.
SOME people have decided to go ahead and pay the OC after the dispute letter has gotten them a deletion, in which case they can do so ANYWAY with insert "a". ( and send the "x" reporting CA a total cease and desist letter).
But if you pay the OC without establishing a CURRENT relationship with the reporting CA, you have NO WAY of getting a deletion.