QUOTE(ZDirect @ Apr 24 2007, 05:49 PM)

So we should not help the borrower with a program that can reduce their interest rate? Or fix their current variable rate.
I never said you shouldn't do consolidations. My issue is that borrowers need to know what they owe, who they owe, and under what terms, before they can possibly decide whether or not consolidation is best for them.
For example lets say we have a borrower LVC at 7.14. It wil be fixed at that rate regardless who is the lender or servicer the borrower chooses.
Right... you're not necessarily doing them a favor by locking them in at the highest rate in the past 10 years, rounded up to 7.25%
I know the borrower benefits are the only difference per lender but even those are pretty much the same too. You have your auto pay and ontime payments. And keep in mind you can only have that on time payment reduction after you consolidate.
That's not true. Some lenders offer reductions on Stafford and Plus loans, and they do not all require a certain number of on-time payments. If they have them, they are almost always better then the 1.25% tops they're going to get from you. If they have no clue what they have, they can't make an informed decision.
There is no reason not to do it.
That's complete and total bull. Again, all variable-rate loans are currently at the highest rate in 10 years. Perkins loans become unsubsidized and lose many forgiveness and cancellation benefits if consolidated. I can elaborate more, but those 2 examples alone are enough.
You do not have to extend your loan, you can keep your same 10 year term if you want. I do not know of any federal student loan consolidation lender that has a prepayment penalty. FFELP lenders can't charge a prepayment penalty. Used-car guys sometimes represent this as being some benefit they offer, when it's really federal law.
It is obvious that the federal government wants to have a monopoly on this 85 billion dollar industry, they want to get rid if the FFEL program and not give the student the choice to have a stafford loan with a lender of their own choosing and not have the choice to consolidate with anyone else other than the William D Ford's Federal Direct Loan Program. And that should be scary for everyone. Choices and competition is what helps bring better services and lower costs to consumers.
Although some of the creators of the Direct Loan program wanted it to replace the FFELP program, it was actually passed into law with the stipulation that it could never have more then 70% of the market. Initially about 30% of the schools signed up, and that has since gone down. Currently, less then 20% of the schools that participate in Title IV student aid are Direct Loan schools. There is absolutely no evidence that the the majority of congress, or ED, wants to get rid of the FFELP.
I've been dealing with this directly along with many others in this industry.
So have I.
Why are you so opposed to someone sharing their experience and voicing how difficult it has been to function without NSLDS.
Are you trying to imply that I'm opposing your free speech by disagreeing with you? Excuse the hell out of me, but I have free speech too, and expressing my disagreement with your opinion is not an act of censorship.
Why are you so pro NSLDS being shutdown?
I am not in favor of NSLDS being shut down, and never said I was.
Are you anyway involved with the shutdown? NO.
Do you have anything to gain from it? I find it very strange that you are so into defending shutdown.
Again, I never said I was in favor of NSLDS being shut down. I suspect you, on the other hand, may have a financial motive for wanting it back up ASAP. I didn't gain anything from it being shutdown, and will gain nothing when it comes back up.
Companies who are aggressively marketing students with mailers are getting the contact information from elsewhere.
I agree.
Credit reports from companies such as Experian who sell list. You can not get an email address from NSLDS, you can not get a phone number from NSLDS and you can not get a home address from NSLDS.
That's absolutely correct. Furthermore, you can not get a list of people to solicit consolidation to from NSLDS, contrary to what some media reports are implying. It was possible to feed SSNs you already had into NSLDS to see who might meet initial eligibility criteria, and, although illegal, it was possible to do so without the borrowers knowledge or consent. It was also possible to use the loan info on NSLDS to perform fraudulent consolidations.
NSLDS is used to determine a borrowers eligibilty (In Default? Loans over 10K?, Not consolidated Already),
it's used to calculate a borrowers new monthly payment. (They all ask what will their new payment be? If I can't give them an answer then they will not want to do business with me).
Of course they want to know that. When I do consolidation apps, which happens once in a blue moon, I start with a blanket statement that I can give them an estimate based on the info they give me, and that the actual interest rate, payment amount, and balance will be based on the exact figures certified by their lenders on the LVC. The normal response is "of course".
If they understand the better the info they give, the better estimate they get, they will gather the info and call back or go on the web to apply once they have it. Since most of them already have most of their loans with us, it's not that hard.
It is used to process an LVC correctly by sending the LVC request to the right servicer and lender. Enough with this "borrower should know their lenders and servicers already. I really wish that were so.
Unbelievable as it may be to you, the vast majority of borrowers know who their lender servicers are. Most of our consolidation loans came from stafford and plus loans we serviced. We're one of the biggest FFELP lenders in the country, and our default rate is below 5%. If they didn't know we had their loans, they wouldn't have been able to consolidate them with us.
I have no clue what small-time nobody marketer you work for, but FYI over 90% of all the FFELs and FDLs that exist are with 5 entities. Most borrowers do consolidate, and the vast majority do it with the company or organization that gave them their loans in the 1st place.
NSLDS lockdown hurts legitimate lenders in servicing accounts somewhat, and hurts the aggressive used-car salesmen that are out of pillage the portfolios of legitimate lenders before the loans even go into grace a lot more.
What's probably going to happen? They're going to make it a bit harder for lenders to get info for a borrower they don't have an existing relationship with, and hopefully ask schools to make it a bit more clear to students that the loans will be reported to at least one CRA, that CRAs routinely sell lists of student loan borrowers to companies that market FFELP consolidations, and that the students can opt-out of having their information sold and thereby avoid getting bombarded by companies they've never heard of long before they graduate. Problem solved.