Anyone noticed this at Walgreens?
#26
Posted 12 January 2005 - 01:53 PM
Is presenting an ID or signing a receipt worth your security?
Seems from the posts I have been reading here that a lot of folks just want the convenience and don't seem to care much about their Identities possibly being stolen...
PLEASE correct me if I am wrong...
I have lived nearly everywhere (Air Force Retiree) and I have always valued my personal security....but this board has me wondering if WE aren't part of the problem of Identity theft....
#27
Posted 12 January 2005 - 01:55 PM
Speaking of that, if you just put "See ID" on your CC and not your signature, then if you call for fraudlent charges isnt that claim null and void due to no sig? In other words, to make a claim stick dont you have to have your CC signed??I think you are putting yourself at risk by not signing your card. I think your signature is part of the requirements to avoid being charged for fraudulent purchases, along with such as reporting a lost card within 24-48 hours of your discovery ect.
#28
Posted 12 January 2005 - 01:59 PM
I think what it is Mr. Snark, Esquire (Seriously, though....
Is presenting an ID or signing a receipt worth your security?
Seems from the posts I have been reading here that a lot of folks just want the convenience and don't seem to care much about their Identities possibly being stolen...
PLEASE correct me if I am wrong...
I have lived nearly everywhere (Air Force Retiree) and I have always valued my personal security....but this board has me wondering if WE aren't part of the problem of Identity theft....
#29
Posted 12 January 2005 - 02:01 PM
#30
Posted 12 January 2005 - 02:03 PM
#31
Posted 12 January 2005 - 02:05 PM
But look for the thread I started yesterday about what FNBMarin TOLD me to do. It was about this very subject.
#32
Posted 12 January 2005 - 02:06 PM
This is nothing new. For the past several months, none of the gas stations I go to have been requiring me to sign a receipt...
If you pay at the pump, you don't sign anything either. Although some bigger cities are requiring a billing zipcode. Some states let you to pump your own gas, unlike New Jersey. Why is that?
Jersey has it so it's a make-work project...
#33
Posted 12 January 2005 - 02:11 PM
Sure, they can compare signatures, but they'd actually have to look at the back of the card, which nobody does. That's why I could write "bite my a$$" on my card, and it wouldn't matter. So, whether I have my signature or "ask for id" or both on my card, it's moot, nobody checks anymore.
#34
Posted 12 January 2005 - 02:17 PM
"bite my a$$". I bet that'd hurt.
#35
Posted 12 January 2005 - 02:36 PM
Yikes!
It was a Walgreens in Rockford, Illinois, too....
scary as i too am in rockford.
I don't mind that we don't sign as most cashiers. 6.50-7$ job don;t look at the signature anyway. Just glance incase their boss is watching. I know years back when i worked retail their were times people would pay back in my electornics department. I looked at cards but only to see if people signed what looked ot be the same name as imprinted on the card.
In my gambling life i used to see a lot of men try to get a cash advance of their "wife, GF, mothers" card only the card only had the female's name so we wouldn't give them the cash. They could have been listed as an AU on the acct but I ain't handing over $1500 to someone off a card that ain't thiers.
#36
Posted 12 January 2005 - 02:39 PM
Yikes!
It was a Walgreens in Rockford, Illinois, too....
scary as i too am in rockford.
I don't mind that we don't sign as most cashiers. 6.50-7$ job don;t look at the signature anyway. Just glance incase their boss is watching. I know years back when i worked retail their were times people would pay back in my electornics department. I looked at cards but only to see if people signed what looked ot be the same name as imprinted on the card.
In my gambling life i used to see a lot of men try to get a cash advance of their "wife, GF, mothers" card only the card only had the female's name so we wouldn't give them the cash. They could have been listed as an AU on the acct but I ain't handing over $1500 to someone off a card that ain't thiers.
never knew I had so many neighbors here...*grin* I'm about a half hour from Rockford...
but the cashiers SHOULD be checking the signatures...that's part of their job...
#37
Posted 12 January 2005 - 02:42 PM
#38
Posted 13 January 2005 - 07:57 PM
I SIGN ALL MINE...ALWAYS HAVE!!!I have signed the back of my cards but underneath the signature I also write "check id". I still only get asked for id every great once in awhile. 95% of places I have used my card at never even look at the back to compare signatures and when the do look at id they again don't check the signatures they just make sure the name matches and that the photo looks close enough. In these instances I have often wondered what might happen if I used my sister's credit card with my id or vice versa, we have similair names. Most likely NOTHING!
"VOID IF NOT SIGNED"
"NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED"
#39
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:01 PM
COMPARE THE SIGNATURE WITH THE CARD NAME AND SIGNATURE ON THE CARD
ID IS NOT REQUIRED ON A SIGNED CARD!!!
#40
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:03 PM
SEE LICENSE
CID
ARE NOT LEGAL SIGNATURES...RENDERING THE CARD VOID
Some (NOT ALL) businesses will refuse unsigned cards (POST OFFICE) is one major player
Edited by GEORGE, 13 January 2005 - 08:04 PM.
#41
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:06 PM
#42
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:13 PM
#43
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:14 PM
My license STAYS IN MY WALLET!!! (ALWAYS DOES)I think what it is Mr. Snark, Esquire (Seriously, though....
Is presenting an ID or signing a receipt worth your security?
Seems from the posts I have been reading here that a lot of folks just want the convenience and don't seem to care much about their Identities possibly being stolen...
PLEASE correct me if I am wrong...
I have lived nearly everywhere (Air Force Retiree) and I have always valued my personal security....but this board has me wondering if WE aren't part of the problem of Identity theft....) is that if you are so persistant on them seeing your ID then bust it out and show it to the person behind the counter and let them know of your fear. As for me, my card is signed and when I sign the recent (where applicable) they can look at both and match em up. Also, people realize, as I said before, that most fraud is done w/o physically having your CC. If your card is stolen then report it and any the CSR will go back to the time the card was stolen and make sure none of the charges were yours. Either way, if they dont ask for your ID and your so admiment about it, then make em see it.
Except I had to take it out to PROVE I'M ME FOR THE SUV I JUST BOUGHT...
(not for the CREDIT CARD TRANSACTION)
AMEX DELTA BTW $17,900+
#44
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:16 PM
BY SIGNING THE CARD...If you read your terms, you have to sign the card for it to be valid
YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THE ACCOUNT...
#45
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:23 PM
If a LOST/STOLEN credit card is picked up at a POS and is returned to your bank...THEY "CAN" REFUSE TO COVER ALL THE FRADULANT CHARGES ON YOUR CARD (probably will cover them...BUT THEY DON'T HAVE TO)...since you were not accepting the rules of the credit card company (YOU MADE YOUR OWN RULES)Speaking of that, if you just put "See ID" on your CC and not your signature, then if you call for fraudlent charges isnt that claim null and void due to no sig? In other words, to make a claim stick dont you have to have your CC signed??I think you are putting yourself at risk by not signing your card. I think your signature is part of the requirements to avoid being charged for fraudulent purchases, along with such as reporting a lost card within 24-48 hours of your discovery ect.
#46
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:25 PM
That's what I figured, that's why a card should be signed. See George we can agree on somethingIf a LOST/STOLEN credit card is picked up at a POS and is returned to your bank...THEY "CAN" REFUSE TO COVER ALL THE FRADULANT CHARGES ON YOUR CARD (probably will cover them...BUT THEY DON'T HAVE TO)...since you were not accepting the rules of the credit card company (YOU MADE YOUR OWN RULES)Speaking of that, if you just put "See ID" on your CC and not your signature, then if you call for fraudlent charges isnt that claim null and void due to no sig? In other words, to make a claim stick dont you have to have your CC signed??I think you are putting yourself at risk by not signing your card. I think your signature is part of the requirements to avoid being charged for fraudulent purchases, along with such as reporting a lost card within 24-48 hours of your discovery ect.
#47
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:25 PM
GIVE YOUR ID WITH THE CREDIT CARD TO THE CASHIER (even if they don't ask)Seriously, though....
Is presenting an ID or signing a receipt worth your security?
Seems from the posts I have been reading here that a lot of folks just want the convenience and don't seem to care much about their Identities possibly being stolen...
PLEASE correct me if I am wrong...
I have lived nearly everywhere (Air Force Retiree) and I have always valued my personal security....but this board has me wondering if WE aren't part of the problem of Identity theft....
PROBLEM SOLVED...YOUR A HAPPY CAMPER!!!
#48
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:28 PM
I went to Walgreen's to pick up a prescription yesterday.
I paid with my Visa card....I gave her the card and she handed it back to me, with the Prescription and the receipt. I asked her why I didn't have to sign anything....she said purchases under $50 didn't need a signature...
Anyone?
A number of years ago, a chain drup store I worked for implemented a policy of not checking id for checks writeen by the patient to pay for a prescription. this was based on the logic that a pharmacist is required by law to dispense prescription drugs only to the patient or someone the patient authorizes. It's illogical to hand someone a bottle of oxycontin and then ask for id only after they hand over a check as payment.
#49
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:31 PM
"VOID IF NOT SIGNED"I have "PLEASE ASK FOR ID" written on all my cards where my signature is supposed to be. In 2.5 years, I've been asked a total of three times for my ID. Sad.
"NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED"
NONE OF THE FOLLOWING ARE VALID SIGNATURES...making the card VOID
CID
SEE ID
SEE LICENSE
#50
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:39 PM
ID ON A CHECK IS LOGICAL--IT IS NOT CASHI went to Walgreen's to pick up a prescription yesterday.
I paid with my Visa card....I gave her the card and she handed it back to me, with the Prescription and the receipt. I asked her why I didn't have to sign anything....she said purchases under $50 didn't need a signature...
Anyone?
A number of years ago, a chain drup store I worked for implemented a policy of not checking id for checks writeen by the patient to pay for a prescription. this was based on the logic that a pharmacist is required by law to dispense prescription drugs only to the patient or someone the patient authorizes. It's illogical to hand someone a bottle of oxycontin and then ask for id only after they hand over a check as payment.
We do everything over $100.00 (and new checks)
"IF" the check bounces...the drivers license is used to STOP people from writing additional checks at any business...(at least the ones who share with the systems we are on)
"IF" they bounce a check you can CUT THEM OFF...but they can go to 50 other places to get their RX
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








