Jump to content




Welcome to CreditBoards!


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to CreditBoards! Like most online communities, you must register to post in our community, but don't worry - this is a simple process requiring minimal information for you to sign up. Be a part of CreditBoards by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Read These Items!

  • If you're getting an Authentication mismatch error: Clear your cache. Log out of CB. Delete your cookie. Close your browser. Open your browser and log back in.

Photo

3 paid medical CA's and paid judgement from same CA.


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 kal el

kal el
  • Members
  • 502 posts

Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:04 PM

just need a lil sense of direction here, I'm dealing with 3 ca's and a judgement that are all paid and show as paid 5 1/2- 6 years ago. I also have a mortgage with a bunch of lates from 3 years ago on a paid closed mortgage showing twice on two reports . I obviously want to have all negatives removed but I was wondering do I do just an initial regular cra dispute for all 5 or 6 TL or should I send out hippa letters for the paid ca accounts and a regular dispute for the judgment then tackle the non medical TL's?


I have opted out and had all addys removed. If a CA verifies and updates the TL, would the addy from time of the ca encounters from past have the addy reinserted?

I just don't want to pull the cart before the horse and get run over in the process.

thanks for the help cb



#2 Why Chat

Why Chat
  • Members
  • 21,146 posts

Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:51 PM

just need a lil sense of direction here, I'm dealing with 3 ca's and a judgement that are all paid and show as paid 5 1/2- 6 years ago. I also have a mortgage with a bunch of lates from 3 years ago on a paid closed mortgage showing twice on two reports . I obviously want to have all negatives removed but I was wondering do I do just an initial regular cra dispute for all 5 or 6 TL or should I send out hippa letters for the paid ca accounts and a regular dispute for the judgment then tackle the non medical TL's?


I have opted out and had all addys removed. If a CA verifies and updates the TL, would the addy from time of the ca encounters from past have the addy reinserted?

I just don't want to pull the cart before the horse and get run over in the process.

thanks for the help cb

Send the initial dispute letter to each CRA ( using a REAL report with its own ID#) this: ( list all MEDICAL ACCOUNTS, but NOT the judgment)
http://www.whychat.5.../hipaadisp.html

If the CRAs do not delete, then you send the reporting CA this: (for accounts reporting as "paid")
http://www.whychat.5...hipaa.html#PAID

and as soon as you have proof of receipt, send this to the CRAs
http://www.whychat.5...aa.html#DISPUTE

In the meantime, get a copy of the RECORDED JUDGMENT and follow these instructions, wait until the medical accounts gave been removed before disputing the judgment.
http://www.whychat.5...deletejudg.html

#3 kal el

kal el
  • Members
  • 502 posts

Posted 09 February 2012 - 03:47 PM

thanks so much Whychat!

two "final" quick questions... will the CRA wonder why I am not disputing the judgement since they are all from the same CA?

also if I can find the judgement online on my states .gov website that means it is recorded correct?

#4 Why Chat

Why Chat
  • Members
  • 21,146 posts

Posted 09 February 2012 - 10:32 PM

thanks so much Whychat!

two "final" quick questions... will the CRA wonder why I am not disputing the judgement since they are all from the same CA?

also if I can find the judgement online on my states .gov website that means it is recorded correct?

The CRAs do not care what you have disputed, they just deal with your actual dispute.

If your judgment was actually adjudicated and entered on the records it would be in the County records, look for "recorded instruments" on your County Clerk's website.You do NOT want to look up the case file, it s possible that the judgment was never recorded. If it WAS recorded, ( which I doubt) and you paid it, then there will also be a release of lien filed.

#5 kal el

kal el
  • Members
  • 502 posts

Posted 18 February 2012 - 11:22 PM

ok so it is a recorded satisfied judgment from 2006, got certified copies of the judgment with the court seal. she was never served though but we also acquired the proof of service saying she was served by CMRR which was notarized.

I fired off the pre HIPAA letters last week. So I'll see how that goes and go from there.

Edited by kal el, 18 February 2012 - 11:24 PM.


#6 Why Chat

Why Chat
  • Members
  • 21,146 posts

Posted 19 February 2012 - 09:30 AM

ok so it is a recorded satisfied judgment from 2006, got certified copies of the judgment with the court seal. she was never served though but we also acquired the proof of service saying she was served by CMRR which was notarized.

I fired off the pre HIPAA letters last week. So I'll see how that goes and go from there.

Wait until the CA accounts are off the reports before disputing the judgment
http://www.whychat.5...deletejudg.html

Edited by Why Chat, 19 February 2012 - 09:31 AM.


#7 kal el

kal el
  • Members
  • 502 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 02:07 PM

thanks whychat, I know USAA monitoring cant be held as fact and they never showed the EQ accounts on there but they are on the actual reports but checking today on USAA all 3 are gone from EX and both EX and EQ scores went up 40 fako points. So hopefully and fingers crossed we are on the right track.

Edited by kal el, 23 February 2012 - 02:08 PM.


#8 kal el

kal el
  • Members
  • 502 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 03:22 PM

nothing official yet but all 3 collections from all 3 reports appear to be gone only a week after them receiving the letters. All are gone from latest USAA pull. Hard not to be excited but Ill wait for official documents. Judgment next.

Edited by kal el, 25 February 2012 - 03:24 PM.





0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



© Copyright 2003 - 2013 Creditboards.com. All rights reserved. No portion of this site may be reproduced without explicit permission from the owners. The content of creditboards.com is subject solely to the personal whim of its admins. We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to remove any and all posts or comments, at any time, for any reason which takes our entirely capricious fancy, or for no particular reason whatsoever, without restriction. Comments or questions regarding the site may be addressed to admin@creditboards.com.